User talk:MurderByDeadcopy/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Welcome!
Hello, MurderByDeadcopy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mlpearc (open channel) 03:18, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fd/TWA_guide_left_bottom.png)
- Hi MurderByDeadcopy! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 23:07, Monday, February 2, 2015 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
gender pay gap
- The topic requires extensive research. Your attempt to make it "more neutral" have almost certainly succeeded in slanting in the direction favored by one of the two US political parties, both of which are irreparably biased. I suggest you do extensive research before you try to make such changes. Cheers. Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 07:13, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
- I did (and continue) to do extensive research on this subject. Most of the gender wage gap article was taken from Consad, which if anyone reads the pdf will realize that they added tons of opinions based on zero statistics. Why is wiki promoting Consad's personal opinions? Is it because all of wiki slants heavily towards libertarian/Ayn Rand political ideology? Maybe you ought to ask more questions before making biased statements on my talk page. MurderByDeadcopy"bang!" 18:18, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia as a source
Hi MBD. Thanks for trying to supply a source for International Debutante Ball. I had to revert it, as it wasn't suitable, and I cut a few of the ones that you added to Emily Post as well. You might want to look into the sources you find a little more, as some of them have been self-published (which is bad enough, in terms of reliable source) versions of Wikipedia itself (which is circular referencing). Cheers, Bromley86 (talk) 11:55, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 October 2015
- WikiConference report: US gathering sees speeches from Andrew Lih, AfroCrowd, and the Archivist of the United States
- News and notes: 2015–2016 Q1 fundraising update sparks mailing list debate
- Traffic report: Screens, Sport, Reddit, and Death
- Featured content: A fistful of dollars
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Edit reverts
Hi, when reverting someone's changes to something, please include a reason. I noticed you reverted me Template:WPX block, and as that was fixing a real bug on certain pages, I've reverted you right back, but was there an actual reason why you did that in the first place? No worries if it was just an accident or something.
Thanks. -— Isarra ༆ 23:02, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- You guessed it! It was an accident!!! I had thought I'd reverted everything, then didn't really know what to do except get some sleep. But I should have given you a heads up which is totally my fault. To be honest, I'm still not sure what happened, except to say that I was checking out my preferences (and quickly reverted those since I have zero desire to edit that fast right now!) Thanks so much for the understanding! MurderByDeadcopy"bang!" 01:28, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 October 2015
- Editorial: Women and Wikipedia: the world is watching
- In the media: "Wikipedia's hostility to women"
- Special report: One year of GamerGate, or how I learned to stop worrying and love bare rule-level consensus
- Featured content: A more balanced week
- Arbitration report: Four ArbCom cases ongoing
- Traffic report: Hiding under the covers of the Internet
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 28 October 2015
- From the editor: The Signpost's reorganization plan—we need your help
- News and notes: English Wikipedia reaches five million articles
- In the media: The world's Wikipedia gaps; Google and Wikipedia accused of tying Ben Carson to NAMBLA
- Arbitration report: A second attempt at Arbitration enforcement
- Traffic report: Canada, the most popular nation on Earth
- Recent research: Student attitudes towards Wikipedia; Jesus, Napoleon and Obama top "Wikipedia social network"; featured article editing patterns in 12 languages
- Featured content: Birds, turtles, and other things
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
- Community letter: Five million articles
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |