User talk:Musicfan2014

Welcome!

Hello, Musicfan2014, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 18:16, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hips Don't Lie may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*[Salsa music|Salsa]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:16, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Xscape (album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Michael Jackson’s ‘Xscape’ Doesn’t Belong to Him — It Belongs to Us «]]</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:16, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Musicfan2014, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Musicfan2014! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Unapologetic, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 02:06, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making controversial changes that have already been discussed on the article's talk page, as you did at Unapologetic, without first establishing consensus on the talk page. Your edits appear to have gone against established consensus and have been reverted. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 00:36, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Unapologetic may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{Infobox album
url=http://www.amazon.co.uk/Unapologetic-Deluxe-Edition-Rihanna/dp/B009P5S11G/ |title=Unapologetic [Deluxe Edition]: Amazon.co.uk: Music |publisher=Amazon.co.uk |date=November 19, 2012|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:17, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making edits which do not reflect established consensus that has been discussed at the article's talk page, as you did here. Such edits may constitute vandalism and can result in the loss of your editing privileges. Please discuss controversial edits on the talk page. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 15:24, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You need to review some of the policies and guidelines I've linked these past few days in my edit summaries while reverting your changes--WP:CONSENSUS and WP:NOR. Using article tags such as the ones in your Guardian and EW sources simply to slap a genre onto the infobox rather than contribute to the article's prose is using a perfectly reliable source's material out of context (WP:STICKTOSOURCE)--both sources did not intend for those tags to be the reviewer's characterization of the album, but as a way of organizing their articles online. Please stop making declarative statements like "It can NOT be...", because it can--there's a previous consensus that addressed the addition of "R&B" and some of the other genres you've been adding--please do not make edits against consensus before establishing a new consensus at the talk page--please review the past consensus. These things have been made clear to you several times before, please do not continue edit warring. You made a bold edit, it was reverted, so discuss it (WP:BOLD) rather than restoring it. Thank you. 15:31, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Final warning for edits against established consensus

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Unapologetic. Dan56 (talk) 00:01, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]