User talk:Mustafa ug

Recent edits to Eastern Mediterranean University

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Eastern Mediterranean University without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Stesmo (talk) 19:39, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Eastern Mediterranean University, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Stesmo (talk) 20:05, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Eastern Mediterranean University shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 21:47, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Eastern Mediterranean University, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. There is no requirement that the links be active for the sources to be valid; archived versions would serve to verify the claims. —C.Fred (talk) 21:47, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Mustafa_ug reported by User:Nomoskedasticity (Result: ). Thank you. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 13:14, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mustafa ug, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mustafa ug! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Soni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:22, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Eastern Mediterranean University

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at WP:AN3#User:Mustafa ug reported by User:Nomoskedasticity (Result: Blocked). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:53, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]