User talk:My-wiki-photos/Archive 2

Munich Shooting

Could You please help me with the Thomas Salbey section on the talk page? It's Pincrete again...--Ltbuni (talk) 22:14, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

I would if I had more time. --My-wiki-photos (talk) 23:10, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Višegrad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Culture House. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, My-wiki-photos. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, My-wiki-photos. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

List of Presidents of the United States

Howdy. Did you not read my edit-summary? Trump wasn't the first US President to not have held any prior elected office. GoodDay (talk) 00:27, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

@GoodDay: He was not. The others who did not hold any prior elected office are indicated as such with the notation: (First elected office) throughout the article (ie. Dwight D. Eisenhower and the others). So, unless you wish to remove that notation for all of them, you need to keep this one for Donald Trump. Please keep the article consistent. --My-wiki-photos (talk) 01:08, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

You put it in the wrong place. If it belongs anywhere, it's at the Prior position column, not the Presidency column. GoodDay (talk) 01:10, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

I have no idea when and by whom the notation (First elected office) was first introduced in the article. The fact is it was already there for a number of presidents without prior office position, and what you did was to remove the notation for Donald Trump only, and not for the others, making the article inconsistent. --My-wiki-photos (talk) 01:20, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

It's not in any of the entries. GoodDay (talk) 01:23, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Currently, (First elected office) is noted for Zachary Taylor, Ulysses S. Grant, Herbert Hoover and Dwight D. Eisenhower. I think Donald Trump should join them. --My-wiki-photos (talk) 01:29, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

I've just deleted the others. My apologies, I hadn't noticed them earlier. GoodDay (talk) 01:33, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

ok then. --My-wiki-photos (talk) 01:33, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rudo municipality

Template:Rudo municipality has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 22:53, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, My-wiki-photos. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

February 2018

Your recent editing history at Stoneman Douglas High School shooting shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:43, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Stoneman Douglas High School shooting‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - MrX 🖋 22:43, 18 February 2018 (UTC)