Hi. Thanks for the message, and well done for finding those iPod Sales figures - your instructions were quite good. I was obviously wrong about the figures being forecast sales.
Anyway, I think it's possible to link to those sales pages directly - I just did right-click and "Copy Link Location" on the link that says "Page 23: Net sales". Try this as a direct link to the sales figures. --IE17:39, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Image:IPod sales quarterly.png listed for deletion
Thanks for uploading Image:Apple 2007Q1.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Hey, thanks for the upload, which I tagged as {{PD-self}} since your upload statement said you released it into the public domain. I wonder if you could crop out some of the whitespace surrounding the chart to make it smaller? Maybe even the key at the bottom, which can be put into the image description page and caption in the article. Also, the data table has been put in and taken out many times, and with it out the page. Perhaps we should discuss major changes like this on the talk page. That will lend stability to the article, necessary for a successful FAC.--HereToHelp00:39, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey I was wondering if you could add another green dot for 2001 Q1, which is currently lacking one. Thanks very much - this is the just the chart that is linked to under the "Sales" section of the iPod page. — mrmaroon25 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
hey i need to know the exact websites of where you got the ipod sales graphs and charts for a research paper. i am not allowed to use wikipedia, so i need the exact source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.15.163.85 (talk) 15:27, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can't see a list of values or a source for the iPod Sales
A tag has been placed on Image:Ipod sales 2008 Q1.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Ipod sales 2008 Q1.svg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sdrtirs (talk) 18:01, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I really appreciate what you do with these graphs. Would it be possible to color-code the bars as to reflect which iPhone model (original, 3G, 3G S) was sold in a particular quarter? Thanks, HereToHelp(talk to me)13:27, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Better! I think the sales-to-date part at the top is a little much. If you can remove that, add a key for which color indicates which model (a job previously done by the sales-to-date graph), and maybe change "hasn't" to "has not", it would be great. Thanks!--HereToHelp(talk to me)18:12, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Garden (platform) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Hysteria18(Talk • Contributions)17:08, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
I was fixing the file description for File:NetBeansIDE.png, and I noticed that you uploaded a new version of the screenshot on 26 December 2009 but left the description alone. I'm confused about where the source of the new image is from. Could you please clarify? Thanks. Kpengboy (talk) 02:21, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:NetBeansLogo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
I've added the plot of Pickering (2002). The Young (1994) formula is difficult to plot here because it's in terms of true altitude, while the others are all in terms of apparent altitude. We could calculate apparent altitude from true altitude by choosing a refraction formula, but that somewhat arbitrary choice would be something else we'd need to explain. I'd rather keep it simple. JeffConrad (talk) 07:15, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In Oct 2010 you added a comment to Airmass discussion about airmass at Zenith greater than 90degrees.
I've added a suggestion to this discussion commencing: "If you want to try the homogeneous spherical model the appropriate variant for use at altitude is given at equation A.4 in Air mass coefficient..."
Hopefully you find this helpful. Regards --anmclarke 02:18, 28 May 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anmclarke (talk • contribs)
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
