User talk:N R Pavan Kumar

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

N R Pavan Kumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please forgive me and im sorry for creating multiple accounts. I dont know how to change the username, so i created new account. So please im very sorry for creating the multiple accounts. Hence i kindly requesting you. Please give me a last chance And please tell me how to change username. N R Pavan Kumar (talk) 08:13, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request —SpacemanSpiff 10:27, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This could account for one of your 20 violations of WP:SOCK. The rest were clearly deliberate attempts to evade your block. Given this, it's likely you aren't eligible for unblock consideration at this time, though another admin will make that determination. As you have previously been told, likely your only path forward is WP:SO which requires zero edits (from any account, not just this account) for at least six months. --Yamla (talk) 11:09, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, Wikipedia is emphatically not for promoting yourself or your app. Please give all of the following links a thorough read: WP:EVADE, WP:PROMO, WP:PROUD, WP:COI, WP:AUTOBIO, WP:GNG, and WP:SPS.

It also does not help that you created two more sockpuppets today. Until you listen to others' feedback, it's unlikely you will be unblocked.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:10, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

N R Pavan Kumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank you for your information. Now i understood. I think that i want to change the username, so i did like that.Thank you for your valuable information. One think is that valid source? for Pawan Kumar N R?19:26, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

{Duplicate request —SpacemanSpiff 10:27, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The request was not specific enough. You may consider leaving your comments on the Talk page or escalating significant issues to the conflict of interest noticeboard.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

N R Pavan Kumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please forgive me and im sorry for creating multiple accounts.N R Pavan Kumar (talk) 08:37, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your latest sock -- Wiki4u120 (talk · contribs · count)was created after you were told not to create more socks and to wait for six months and apply per WP:SO, so your assurance isn't going to hold up. Any further frivolous requests and your talk page access will also be revoked. In the meantime read WP:SO and wait for six months before applying for an unblock. —SpacemanSpiff 10:27, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

N R Pavan Kumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

ok thank you:)N R Pavan Kumar (talk) 13:09, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Clearly, you are incapable of keeping your promise to cease sockpuppetry. Note that the 6-month waiting period of WP:SO resets every time you sock.--Jasper Deng (talk) 09:22, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

N R Pavan Kumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am very sorry for crating multiple account. Because i need to cange username so i did like that. Hence i kindly requesting you to please unblock me I am waiting for 6 months. Please give me a chance.

Decline reason:

This may excuse one of your sockpuppet accounts. You had more than twenty, so that doesn't work. Additionally, it's not true that you've waited six months. Yamla (talk) 15:39, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

N R Pavan Kumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No, I think in the month of July I got blocked, now December 6 months over I guess. And one more please help me how to change the username please...

Decline reason:

Your block appeal has been reviewed and we are unable to unblock you at this time. However, you may wish to make use of our "standard offer", which provides a route back to editing for users subject to indefinite blocks. The guidelines for the Standard Offer are simple:

1. Wait six months without sockpuppetry. That means no editing the English Wikipedia, under this account or any other, for six months. 2. Promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block/ban. You must show us that you understand what went wrong and know how to keep it from happening again. 3. Don't create any extraordinary reasons for the Wikipedia community to object to a return.

If, at the end of six months, you've adhered to these conditions, you may then request that the community discuss unblocking you.

Please see WP:OFFER for full details about the Standard Offer.

Just Chilling (talk) 21:43, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Break for discussion

This link shows how the math works. You'll still need to convincingly explain your sockpuppetry and how we can trust you'll never again violate WP:SOCK. --Yamla (talk) 16:08, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, 2017-04-01T10:35:26 Favonian (talk | contribs | block) blocked N R Pavan Kumar -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:44, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's not the date of the last sockpuppet. The last one I could easily find was for 2017-07-04. --Yamla (talk) 16:55, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oooohhhh. At least they own that sock. January something it is then. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:23, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I make no comment about your block; but to get a change of name - which you CANNOT do yourself - see WP:RENAME. Of course, you cannot do this while blocked. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 23:25, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

N R Pavan Kumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me I am waiting for 6 months.

Decline reason:

Your last unblock request was just denied on January 1st. Six months will be July 1st. Please do not post another request to unblock until then. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:17, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

N R Pavan Kumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

NO on July 4, 2017, I was blocked. So, July 4, 2017, plus 6 months equal to January 4, 2018. since six months I am waiting. Please unblock me. I didn't do any sockpuppet. Please...

Decline reason:

Only one unblock request is required. Multiple requests will not notify anyone - and will not speed the process up in any way. SQL ^{Query me!} 03:44, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

N R Pavan Kumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

On July 4, 2017, I was blocked. Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

If you would like to review the guide to appealing blocks, and make a request here that addresses the reason for your block - and how you will avoid that behavior in the future I can copy your request to the administrators noticeboard for review by the community. Please note that simply 'It has been 6 months' will not be sufficient for this purpose, and a checkuser will very likely check to see if you have been editing Wikipedia logged out, or with other accounts. Additionally, continuing to make insufficient requests may end in the revocation of your privilege to edit this page. SQL ^{Query me!} 03:48, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. On July 4th 2017 I was blocked. So please unblock me and please give me a chance.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

N R Pavan Kumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please unblock me and please give me a chance.

Decline reason:

You were already asked to post a meaningful unblock request and you can't seem to understand that. I'm revoking talk page access now per the earlier unblock decline. You can appeal you block through WP:UTRS but if you continue to do this there then your access to that medium will also be revoked. Submit a meaningful request , just being blocked for six months doesn't entitle you to be unblocked, given the level of disruption you caused and are causing even now with the multiple and duplicate requests, one that I had to remove just now. —SpacemanSpiff 10:36, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Each time you do this, the clock resets. The earliest date you can be unblocked is now 12 July.--Jasper Deng (talk) 07:02, 12 January 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

N R Pavan Kumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20308 was submitted on Jan 12, 2018 17:27:18. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 17:27, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: New sock -- Standardwikis blocked on Feb 24, 2018. —SpacemanSpiff 11:47, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

IP socking for same self promotion as recent as 11/April/2018 -- [1]. —SpacemanSpiff 14:45, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/N R Pavan Kumar, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

–Ammarpad (talk) 07:15, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ban evasion

This user has engaged in block/ban evasion as recently as July, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 19:31, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request carried to WP:AN

here. Please see UTRS appeal #37112. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:46, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This unblock request was declined; see here. --Yamla (talk) 11:53, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll make a note on the UTRS ticket. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:42, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]