User talk:Nabasile

Nabasile, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Nabasile! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Keelan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

If you want to get {u|ToBeFree}}'s attention you need to link to their username and sign your post (~~~~) in the same edit.

Please explain the contradiction in "I didn't abuse multiple accounts" and "please unblock me and the other account Arcebasile". You were cautioned about the use of multiple accounts a month ago and you just removed the caution. Cabayi (talk) 20:34, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but not today.

While it wasn't done using the standard template, this is pretty much a "declined unblock request regarding a currently active block" (WP:UP#CMT); please do not remove it while the block is active. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:04, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ToBeFree, How many years do I have to be blocked for? Leave me a message. 08:53, 14th September 2021

ToBeFree can you please how long will I be blocked for? Please send me a message I'm sorry!😞😭

"If you want to get ToBeFree's attention you need to link to their username (User:ToBeFree) and sign your post (~~~~, four tildes, not five) in the same edit."

Indefinite means until you answer the questions about your past behaviour and reassure the community that the block serves no purpose. Blanking the messages & questions you find awkward doesn't make a favourable impression in that regard. Cabayi (talk) 11:16, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming

Renamer note: User has made at least two requests for renaming. User is not eligible to rename so long as they are blocked. User is advised that renaming will not change their block. User is cautioned against evading their block by creating another account or editing while not logged in. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:18, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE UNBLOCK ME NOW

At first I realised my mistake as well as apologize. And yes I did ~~not~~^{Special:Diff/1044325188 ~ToBeFree} abuse multiple accounts. And yes I got a second account. I am 100 percent sure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nabasile (talk • contribs) 15:18, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is incredibly unlikely that you will be unblocked in the near future. You are blocked for WP:sock puppetry. Sock puppetry destroys the Community's trust in a user. It is a serious matter. Please read the Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks#Sockpuppetry blocks. You can seek advice via IRC chat at https://web.libera.chat/?channel=#wikipedia-en-unblock --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:58, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You did abuse multiple accounts: Nabasile (talk · contribs) was blocked, and you used the second account Arcebasile (talk · contribs) to evade that block. Block evasion is abuse of multiple accounts (cf. WP:ILLEGIT, "Evasion of sanctions"; and WP:BE). ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:59, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Does it mean I'm blocked for a short time? Nabasile (talk) 17:15, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ToBeFree I know I did abuse multiple accounts but does it mean I'm blocked for a short time?, because i don't wanna be blocked forever!😭😥😟 Nabasile (talk) 17:27, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay ToBeFree, I requested an unblock for Nabasile and Arcebasile accounts. Nabasile (talk) 20:13, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ToBeFree, how long until you unblock Nabasile and Arcebasile accounts? Nabasile (talk) 20:38, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Signatures

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:01, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Unblock Request

Hello, Nabasile,

You have been blocked for sockpuppetry which is a serious offense. Repeatedly posting "Unblock me!!" will not get you unblocked and if you continue to edit disruptively, your talk page access will be removed and it will be much harder to make an unblock request later. Please stop and actually read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks for information that is relevant to your situation. The primary advice is to not create any more accounts, if you continue to do sockpuppetry, you'll never get unblocked. If you quit, wait a sufficient amount of time and post a good unblock request, there is the possibility that you can return to being an editor in good standing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:31, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nabasile, can you not see the contradiction in promising not to use multiple accounts and requesting two accounts be unblocked? Cabayi (talk) 08:18, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I can see the contradiction and I'll promise not to use multiple accounts again. Nabasile (talk) 16:14, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I answers the question about my past behaviour and assured the community. Nabasile (talk) 16:45, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ToBeFree can you please add an expiry date please for Nabasile and Arcebasile accounts please?, I'll even make you a good deal. Nabasile (talk) 18:51, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Standard offer

The standard offer--

Wait at least six months, without sockpuppetry or block evasion; i.e. having made no edit, using any account or anonymously, on English Wikipedia.
Promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block/ban.
Don't give people reasons to object to your return.

After you have waited six months, contact an administrator and address the reasons for your block. This is not a get-out-of-jail-free card, and administrators are not forced to unblock you, especially if you have not provided any reason why you should be unblocked other than your avoidance of Wikipedia for six months. You should provide a clear reason why you should be unblocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:01, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

^ yup, that's perfectly agreeable and the closest to an expiry date I can currently offer as well. If you speak any other languages than English, or if you are interested in any other Wikimedia project than Wikipedia, please have a look at the following list of projects: meta:List of Wikimedia projects by size. The block only applies to the English Wikipedia. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:33, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But if you do that, be very careful. Some have a "one strike rule".. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:42, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deepfriedoka, can you send me a message about how long do I have to be blocked?, because I don't want to be banned from Wikipedia for good. Nabasile (talk) 20:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm temporarily revoking talk page access due to repeated re-asking of already-answered questions to encourage reading instead of increasingly disruptive writing. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:29, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deepfriedoka, can you send me a message about how long do I have to be blocked?, because I don't want to be banned from Wikipedia for good. Nabasile (talk) 20:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Please read the foregoing. There will be no automatic unblocking. You must address the reasons for your block and describe what constructive edits you would make. Your best possibility is to not edit Wikipedia for six months and then request unblocking. If you can constructively edit on a different project (meta:List of Wikimedia projects by size) during that time, it will weigh in your favor. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:34, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Without sockpuppetry or block evasion"

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Nabasile
Arcebasile (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Cpu8 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:48, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

I am so sorry I didn't remember that at all can you please unblock me please? I won't do anymore sockpuppetry and I promise that i won't abuse multiple accounts again. Nabasile (talk) 20:41, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Read the instructions given to you here. Also, I find it very hard to believe that you just outright forgot that you did this previously, considering that you asked for your main to be unblocked on your sockpuppet accounts. Jurta talk 20:47, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

I requested that this block will be lifted today Geraldo Perez. I will promise that from this day forward I will never have block evasion again and I decided that this case of sockpuppet is now finally closed for good. Nabasile (talk) 18:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks and use {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}} to actually request an unblock so that admins will see the request. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:43, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nabasile (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will never do sockpuppetry again.

Decline reason:

You clearly demonstrated you aren't willing to abide by our policies. You were blocked for abusing multiple accounts back in September and rather than stopping, you set up additional accounts to evade your block. Your best bet now is to go six months with zero edits anywhere. Then you can apply under WP:SO. Given that you've demonstrated we can't trust your word, this is probably your only option at this point. Yamla (talk) 11:35, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

86.15.85.25 again

You've been editing as 86.15.85.25 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) again. That's less than a week after your last unblock request attempt (diff). Patience isn't infinite; I'll revoke talk page access and you can appeal via WP:UTRS after actually waiting six months without sockpuppetry. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:52, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:53, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Boundless (production company)

Hello, Nabasile, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username VickKiang, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Boundless (production company), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boundless (production company).

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

VickKiang (talk) 01:14, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]