User talk:Nadia12m

This is Nadia12m's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rodan + Fields (April 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

In addition, not sure it passes notability criteria. Most of the references are either not independent, or press releases.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rodan + Fields and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:13, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Nadia12m, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:13, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing[edit]

I see Katie Rodan was created 12 February 2015 then you created the polished Draft:Rodan + Fields 15 April 2016 in one edit‎. Both subjects have been around a long time and yet both of these pages were created so close together in time. Are you User:Slestrella? Are you a paid editor? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:28, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You are continuing to edit without answering the above questions. Please answer. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:55, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nadia12m, why are you ignoring Anna? Dirroli (talk) 05:35, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anna and Dirroli, sorry I didn't notice there were any comments in here until today, I was not ignoring you. I do work with Rodan + Fields but am not a copy writer or paid editor. I work for a third party Marketing Agency that does consulting for R+F. Is it against Wikipedia's rules for me to post a page? Nadia12m (talk) 16:33, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rodan + Fields (April 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ringbang was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rodan + Fields and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ringbang (talk) 22:08, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rodan + Fields (May 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Although I am familiar with this company, this is still questionable for the needed solid independent notability for its own article, still needs any additional amount of in-depth third-party news sources overall.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rodan + Fields and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:50, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rodan + Fields has been accepted[edit]

Rodan + Fields, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:10, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Katie Rodan has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Katie Rodan. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:48, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Katie Rodan (September 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Rodan + Fields. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A decision was made to delete the article on Dr. Fields, but any information about her can be added to the article about the company. In order to create an article specifically about her, it will have to have significantly more information than the deleted article about her.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Katie Rodan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 12:27, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]