User talk:National AntiVirus

October 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the United States and Japan has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the United States and Japan was changed by National AntiVirus (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2017-10-25T01:54:01+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:54, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bombing of Tokyo, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 06:16, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Attack on Pearl Harbor, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 03:46, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I note that even when your edits are factual in nature, you do not provide a source to support them, as required by our verifiability policy, and therefore are deleted. Between your point of view edits and your unsourced edits, almost all of your edits have been deleted. This is a waste of your time and ours.

Please do not insert commentary or opinions into articles, and when the factual information you're adding is about a controversial subject (such as North Korea), always provide a citation from a reliable source. Also, do not add information before an already cited source without adding an additional source, because the reader will assume that the existing citation covers the new information. If you can manage to do these things, you may see some of your edits in the encyclopedia and not have them be deleted. If you keep editing in the way that you are now, it is almost inevitable that you will at some point be blocked from editing. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:55, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Russia–United States relations. - MrX 12:32, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Kuril Islands dispute. Binksternet (talk) 00:41, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:58, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Andersen Air Force Base. 331dot (talk) 01:49, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's really not a good idea to repeat the editing behavior you were blocked for unless you want a longer block. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:36, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Bombing of Tokyo, you may be blocked from editing. Chris Troutman (talk) 07:42, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Key Resolve. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:16, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 20:35, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

I suggest you read Wikipedia:Copyrights. Directly copy-pasting material (with the exception of clearly marked quotations, where appropriate) is not only a violation of Wikipedia policy, but could possibly render you liable to legal action by the copyright owner. I have reverted your edit here [1], and suggest that you either paraphrase it in your own words, or add a link to the source to the article talk page, where someone else can do so. 86.131.45.195 (talk) 02:02, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Your addition to Spratly Islands dispute has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Ninja Diannaa (Talk) 22:13, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:08, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you continued to add copyright material to Wikipedia in violation of our copyright policy. You cannot resume editing until you provide a clear statement that demonstrates that you have read and understand our copyright policy and intend to follow it in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:09, 11 January 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

National AntiVirus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23763 was submitted on Jan 14, 2019 06:23:41. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 06:23, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]