User talk:Naveen Sankar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

You can put your messages by clicking the link below or by editing this talk page.

Post a message


MESSAGE BOX[edit]

WP:PHYS[edit]

Hi, I notice that you had some interest in physics. Might I interest you in joining WikiProject Physics?Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 07:07, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

thalavoor[edit]

Hi..nice to see those pics of thalavoor..makes me kinda nostalgic..i'm basically frm there..nw in tvm..keep up the good work..!

anoop —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.199.5.172 (talk) 07:06, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Kottarakkara[edit]

Hello,

A curious reader of Kerala history, I would be grateful to have some information on the royal families that stayed in Kottarakkara. The earliest reference I get is to Ilayidathu Swaroopam. When did they settle in Kottarakkara? Was there any other family before them? Any clue when the first palace was constructed by the royals? I checked with a few well-educated people from Kottarakkara but they could't throw any light on the history of the area. They keep talking about 'land of palaces' theory (which is rubbish)and about Film actors.

Changanacherry, where I lived till I migrated out of Kerala, too appears in Wikipedia. It did not contain any section for History which I added last week. Please go through it. I will be updating the Wikipedia write-up on Kottarakkara, though it will be brief, because not much information is forthcoming from the people of the town.

I am sure you can help me. My email: raj400064@gmail.com

Raj Menon, Mumbai 05.01.10

Nakshatra Entry Dear Naveen

I notice that you had edited the nakshatra page and tabulated the 27 asterisms. Well done. Can you please also include the Tamil language equivalents for each nakshatra (in addition to the current Devanagari) as was included in the previous version. You had inadvertently dropped that.

Many thanks, Dipendra--Dipendra2007 (talk) 14:49, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

{{Hinduism}}[edit]

Can you discuss the merger of various Hinduism related templates into one on the Hinduism Noticeboard, to see if there is consensus for such a change (not many editors have the template page on their watchlist, and so would not have noticed the recent changes) ? Till such a discussion is concluded, it would be advisable not to substitute {{Hindu scriptures}}, {{Hindu philosophy}} etc, out of articles. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 04:34, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Note for you on Template talk:Hinduism. --Redtigerxyz Talk 05:56, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Namakarana[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Namakarana has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dictionary definition with no indication of WP:notability, no context and no references to WP:reliable sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 16:00, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jatakarman[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Jatakarman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dictionary definition with no indication of WP:notability, no context.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 16:00, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Template[edit]

Hello, I think you are expert in modifying/creating the template. It would be great if you can look at Shri Gaudapadacharya Math and see if you can help edit or provide or suggest better template. I just took it from some other page and tried to modify it for this page. Thank you in advance. --Ashok Prabhu (Talk) 08:50, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Diff[edit]

Hi Naveen,

You changed the Devanagari of the Satyameva Jayate verse — and it no longer matches the transliteration, nor the version given in the sanskritdocuments source, nor the translation ("sages" is more likely to be "ṛṣayo" than "मनुष्यो", right?). Could you check for the correct version and fix it? Thanks, Shreevatsa (talk) 13:50, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

I've changed this; I searched online and the earlier version seems more common (is the only one found in books, etc.). Regards, Shreevatsa (talk) 15:48, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Invite to WikiConference India 2011[edit]

WCI banner.png

Hi Naveen Sankar,

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.
You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form.

But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach.

As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

template:hinduism[edit]

This edit is highly inappropriate: it makes the template code far less maintainable and wasn't accompanied by so much as a comment on the talk page. Unless you have a better reason for it than personal aesthetic quibbles (which could probably be easily fixed if you'd bothered to ask me rather than just hitting the revert button and wandering off) then I'll be restoring the updated code. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 14:31, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

I've now reverted to the updated codebase. In future, when reverting such a significant amount of work please consider taking the small amount of time required to justify the undo on the template talk page or with the editor in question. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 13:14, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwrk. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to K2 seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. FO with the repetitive Indian claims to the area where K2 is located. FO, just FO! Qwrk (talk) 18:38, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Naveen Sankar. You have new messages at Talk:Mahabharata#Sanskrit_source_for_the_name_.27mahabharata.27.
Message added 15:22, 27 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Discussion about IAST Redtigerxyz Talk 15:22, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

May 2013[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Tulu language does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks!  Abhishek  Talk 18:04, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Naveen Sankar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vedarambha[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Vedarambha has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.