User talk:Nithesh gaikwad

List of Indian entrepreneurs

Hello. Your recent edit to List of Indian entrepreneurs appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:25, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kishor Patil for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kishor Patil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kishor Patil until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:22, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kishor patil

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kishor patil, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kishor Patil. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PICKLEDICAE🥒 14:05, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:32, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting for Unblocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nithesh gaikwad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

A few weeks ago, on 12th Sep 2022, my Wikipedia account Nithesh Gaikwad was blocked. The reason stated by the moderator Bbb23 was <"Account is being used only for advertising or promotion">. I am writing today to request for unblocking of my account Nithesh gaikwad. Please note that I am an employee of KPIT. As per Wikipedia guidelines, I qualify as a paid editor, which I failed to declare before making the edits or creating new content. The intention was not to compromise the content quality or integrity of the platform but was only to make edits to reflect current information pertaining to the latest happenings in our organization, hence ensuring accurate information is available for people to refer to. I understand that the updates/changes in the content I had made may not have adhered to Wikipedia’s guidelines. But I have utilized time since unblocking of my account to understand the guidelines and processes better. I am more aware now and intend to make a meaningful contribution to Wikipedia. I would like to kindly request for unblocking of my account and allow me to continue making contributions to Wikipedia. I have thoroughly read through most of Wikipedia’s guidelines and will ensure that all edits/update requests I make are valid and adhere to the guidelines. Currently, as a paid editor for KPIT, my responsibility is to make edits to KPIT and Ravi Pandit’s pages and to create a new page for Kishor Patil <Co-founder and CEO of KPIT Technologies> to ensure information is true and accurate on the public platform. With this said, I request you to review the block and help me by giving me access to contribute more relevant information to the handles I have earlier commented on.Nithesh gaikwad (talk) 09:35, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since you indicate you will continue the activites for which you were blocked, there are no grounds to remove the block. Before being permitted to indirectly contribute in the area of your conflict of interest, you will need to build an edit history that demonstrates your understanding of content policies and guidelines by (after you make the required paid disclosure) editing in areas unrelated to your COI. Otherwise, allowing you to immediately make COI contributions would likely be a waste of time for everyone(including you). Be aware that our main purpose is not "true" information, but information that can be verified, see WP:TRUTH- we summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage say about a topic, not what it wants to say about itself. If you want to edit about other topics, please tell what. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:26, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.