User talk:Giraffer
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Your GA nomination of 2022 Bahrain Grand Prix
[edit]The article 2022 Bahrain Grand Prix you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:2022 Bahrain Grand Prix for comments about the article, and Talk:2022 Bahrain Grand Prix/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DoctorWhoFan91 -- DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 20:05, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
DYK for 2022 Bahrain Grand Prix
[edit]
On 7 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2022 Bahrain Grand Prix, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the first Chinese driver to race in Formula One debuted at the 2022 Bahrain Grand Prix? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2022 Bahrain Grand Prix. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2022 Bahrain Grand Prix), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
ACE guide
[edit]It's actually 3 GAs, Rosetta Lawson, Jesse Lawson, and Frelinghuysen University. Just one, Anna Cooper, away from a good topic. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Whoops, typo. Thanks for pointing it out. Giraffer (talk) 13:18, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- No worries, thanks for working on a guide. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:22, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Giraffer,
I was noticing that because of my high edit count, you weren't able to gauge some figures for my contributions for your charts. Through jumping through some hoopts (hitting the Edit Count link, logging in, getting timed out, going back to Edit Count, logging in again, etc.), I can get a page with my edit breakdown. I totaled up my posts to Arbitration pages and Arbitration case pages (ommitting ArbCom election pages) and I got a total of 539 edits to Arbitration pages and 476 edits to Arbitration talk pages. Much of those edits occurred during my two year stint as an arbitration clerk. If you need any more figures, just let me know. Thanks for going to the work of putting together your guide. Liz Read! Talk! 21:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for this! I've added it to the guide. Giraffer (talk) 21:54, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2018 United States Grand Prix
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2018 United States Grand Prix you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 22:05, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2018 United States Grand Prix
[edit]The article 2018 United States Grand Prix you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2018 United States Grand Prix and Talk:2018 United States Grand Prix/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 22:22, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Possible question number error at ACE voter guide
[edit]In ScottishFinnishRadish's section on your voter guide, you have Wrote a detailed answer to Q7 on when to accept a case based on secret evidence, which is worth reading.
SFR's Q7 is about WPO. Q4 is about a detailed answer about secret evidence. Both are interesting, but I think you might've made a typo. Toadspike [Talk] 15:03, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Bleugh, I have too many tabs open. Thanks for pointing out the error, and I'm glad to see someone is reading the guide in that much depth! Giraffer (talk) 15:12, 18 November 2024 (UTC)