User talk:Npatel64
|
I replaced the tags you removed from the article because all of the issues still exists. First, the article needs to be "wikified." It lacks internal links, categories, and other features of Wikipedia articles. Secondly, it appears that this article was created by the subject. Autobiographical articles are generally frowned upon (see WP:COI). Even if you feel you are notable, it is usually better to wait until somebody else feels the same way and writes an article about you. Third, the article reads like a resume, not like an encyclopedia articles. It is just a list of various jobs with no context. Please do not remove the tags from the article without addressing the issues. Please let me know if you have any questions. janejellyroll 01:34, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Please stop removing the "autobiography" tag from this article. Your user name is the same as the subject's, so the tag belongs on the article. If you aren't comfortable with other editors making changes to your article, please do not post it on Wikipedia. janejellyroll 02:07, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
You keep reverting changes without using an edit summary. You do not respond to talk page messages. I don't want to take this to the administrator level, so please discuss this with me somewhere. The tag that I am placing ("autobiography") is perfectly justifiable, as you have created an autobiography on Wikipedia. Please respond. janejellyroll 02:13, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Before you remove the autobiography tag from your article again, I would recommend you take a look at WP:3RR.--Xnuala (talk) 02:15, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Neil patel. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. It would really help us if you would communicate your intentions to us. Are you blanking the page because you want to recreate the article, or are you doing so to be disruptive. We would like to help you, but without your participation we don't have the ability to. Thanks.--Xnuala (talk) 02:28, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Please don't remove the speedy deletion tag. As Xnuala said above, we'd be happy to help you do whatever it is you're trying to do (if it is constructive), but you have to let us know what it is you want. janejellyroll 02:30, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Maria Mileaf, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.wetweb.org/aperfectcouple/maria.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:18, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
April 2013
[edit]Hello, Npatel64. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Neil Patel, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- You need not declare your conflict of interest, but we recommend it.
- Do not edit articles about yourself, your organization, or your competitors. Do not edit related articles. (Exceptions.)
- Post suggestions and sources on the article's talk page, or create a draft in your user space.
- Your role is to summarize, inform and reference — not to promote, sell, or whitewash.
- If writing a draft, write without bias, as if you don't work for the company or personally know the subject.
- Have us review your draft.
- Work with us and we'll work with you.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Safehaven86 (talk) 20:23, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Neil Patel.jpg
[edit]A tag has been placed on File:Neil Patel.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ronhjones (Talk) 21:03, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Photograph
[edit]So I'm guessing this hasn't been an enjoyable experience for you so far. Anyway, I noticed there was a photograph, then it got deleted because of permissions issues. If you're willing to donate the photograph under CC-By-SA to Wikipedia, I'll be glad to help you get it processed and added back to the article. Drop me a line on my talk page. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 02:27, 19 April 2013 (UTC)