Hello, Ollie4545! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! SPF121188(talk this way)(contribs)16:49, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Completely wrong and false. I have never had various accounts and I do not get involved in "prohibited practices."
My name is Olivier Acuna Barba. I am currently in Castelldefels, Spain. I am open to sharing any other information you need to confirm that this accusation is completely false and even offensive.
Hi, my name is Olivier Acuña Barba. I do not have several Wikipedia accounts and much less do I get involved in "prohibited purposes."
I have just recently created my first ever Wikipedia account. Let me know what kind of evidence I can submit to prove I am not using multiple accounts and that I do not use my only account for "prohibited purposes."
And now that I am here, I want to say I was appalled by the way people in the "live help" page treated me. Sarcasm and offensive replies is how the conversation there can easily be described and it is from that conversation that I believe I am now being falsely accused of things I would never do.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:
As other reviewers have noted, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable . Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple publishedsecondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see referencing for beginners. Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IoTeX and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:IoTeX, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Ollie4545!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cabrils (talk) 23:38, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Cabrils, thanks for the message. Yes, it is a bit disappointing but I understand the strict guidelines. Where I was truly disappointed was when chatting yester in the live help forum. But anyway, I also understand how many malicious or deceitful characters plague these spaces.
Let me firstly thank you profoundly for all your suggestions and for reviewing the IoTeX submission.
Also, I did try to disclose any potential COI on my user page but was not able. I am a bit lame with these things sometimes, so further guidance would be deeply appreciated.
Lastly, let me assure you we have not paid anybody to write or submit the IoTeX wikipedia page, much less have we approached any fake news or shady offerings.
We do, however, firmly understand and have observed that malicious actors have "edited" and submitted versions that would appear to be with the only intention of ruining any possibility for the IoTeX page to be published.
We are by no means trying to "sneak" by or maliciously or ill-conceivedly attempting to publish a page that is not within the WikiPedia editorial guidelines.
At this point, I would like to kindly and respectfully ask if you believe we should even continue editing and submitting or is this page unfortunately flagged so as to never, ever be published?
We would not like to waste anybody's time attempting to do what we strongly believe is not wrong: publish a pure objective and factual IoTeX WikiPedia page.
I thank you for your time, patience and consideration, and look forward to a reply.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Per previous declines - this lacks any independent, in depth coverage. Do not resubmit again without addressing both the tone, the bulk of the content and sourcing. We are not interested in every release -github, their own website etc...are fine to establish that xyz exists but not notablity.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IoTeX and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:IoTeX, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:
By my count there are two reliable independent sources in the article, both consumer-targeted reviews of the webcam which takes up a single paragraph of the body text. Everything else is unsupported by secondary sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IoTeX and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:IoTeX, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! SPF121188 (talk this way) (contribs) 16:49, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/UA85. Thank you. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 20:02, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
