User talk:Omtay38/Archive 2

This is an Archive of my talk page. Please do not respond to anything here or modify anything here. Instead, please go to my talk page. Thanks!

For an index of all posts to my talk page ever, take a look at the index.

thanks

....for the revert on my userpage! Flyguy649 ^talk _contribs 07:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No Prob! --omtay 38 07:27, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and Feedback

First, thanks for the message you left on my talkpage :). Glad that rating all those articles was of so much help to the project.

Secondly, some feedback on the Chicago article as requested. This is the first time ive given a "Review" for an article so i hope im not being to mean (or unmean lol). Ive based review mainly on the article structure and my personal opinions.

Plot Synopsis is good but could do with slight expansion and also cleaning up of other areas to make it flow better.
The Musical Analysis section LOOKS very messy in presentation terms but the information is very good, perhaps make a table and also include who sings the song?
Hisory section should go before the plot synopsis.
Found something on the article structure page that must have been removed (Not sure if you removed it or someone else did before. It was

In "Nowadays", Roxie and Velma sing about the "good things" of life in 1924. The items that they identify as "good" however, including booze, cheating, and murdering, are not good. This song that is, on surface level, about the good life, upon further analysis, is about the corruption present in 1924. Several times throughout the song, the two sing, "In fifty years or so / It's gonna change, you know." Chicago was set in 1924 and premiered in 1975. Through their sarcasm, Roxie and Velma are, in fact, accusing the audience of being everything "bad" depicted in the musical. (From the musical Chicago)

I think this analysis is quite good and could possibly be added.

Deletion of the "Red-Linked" actors in the Famous actors and actressed list.
I dont think the reference of the film Roxie Hart (film) should be in this article as it is based on the play and not the musical. Therefroe the adaptions section could be renamed something like "Film Adaption" or something :S.
Is missing a "Response" section and a "Recordings" section which could greatly expand the information provided in the article.

Other than that, a very good article. Possibly could be made into a "Good" class article some day?

Mark E 14:16, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Msg. left to me by you on Talk Page

Hi, I apologize for that.It would be nice if you could call the troll 164.156.231.55 an editor, but it's a troll. I won't counteract them again, but you should put a stop on THEIR VANDALISM. I was merely trying to get them to stop vandalizing the TPIR page....no harm meant. Thanks Hdayejr 20:31, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Name

My name is Tay. Too bad you're a pussy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.135.43.106 (talk • contribs) 20:50, July 11, 2007.

Just a note for other readers: I do not delete messages from my talk page. They get archived when the time comes, until then, please enjoy the name calling :-D --omtay 38 02:38, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Your userspace gets vandalized a lot. You ought to put up a vandalism counter. :) -- Ssilvers 03:01, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HAHA! I don't wanna give them the satisfaction of knowing that my number has gone up :-D --omtay 38 03:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Just a note

I understand to keep a cool head, but his constant vandilism to articles and other's user pages, and his falsifying information obsesvily, really placed the last hair. I'm pretty sure my actions were justified. — Ian Lee (Talk) 02:33, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage protection

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage. I go out to run an errand and come back to find it's been vandalized 5 times! I suspect this is the same AOL user who got bent out of shape for being warned in May, who repeatedly vandalized my page then. Anyway, thanks again. An administrator has semi-protected my userpage so that anonymous IP addresses can no longer edit it. In May it got protected for 1 month; hopefully this time it's permanent. There is absolutely no reason why an anonymous IP should be allowed to edit registered userpages anyway. -Amatulic 06:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can put the blame partially on AOL. For years now, they've made the "throwaway" free kits available to anyone without requiring much information. If AOL really gave a good damn about the internet, they'd require information to verify the individual using it, such as it is, they don't. If they gave a crap about the internet(which I haven't seen thing one in 10 years to the contrary), they would do this. Until then, AOL will be the crapstain of the internet they've always been!!!! Hdayejr 16:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it's been the same vandal for a long time now (months). His vandal edits are essentially the same (he's obsessed with "Justin's" penis for some reason, frequently posting a message to that effect on the Tiny article), and he follows a predictable pattern: if you warn him, he vandalizes your userpage. If you get your userpage protected, he vandalizes your talk page.

This isn't an AOL throwaway account. This is an AOL customer. The same AOL customer. The real problem with AOL is that AOL assigns each customer a new IP address on almost every HTTP request. Therefore it's impossible to block an anonymous AOL user. -Amatulic 22:32, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

F*** YOU

F*** YOU. I HOPE YOUR FAMILY DIES AND YOU DIE AND YOUR BROTHER AND SISTERS DIE AND I HOPE YOU DIE. I HOPE YOU GET AIDS AND DIE AND GET YOUR A** F*****. I HOPE YOU DIE AGAIN AND SUCKS SATAN'S C*** YOU DIRTY B**** N**** N******. F*** YOU C*********. F*** YOU F****** B**** F*** YOU F*** YOU FROM SOMEONE YOU F***** YOU DIRTY PIECE OF S***! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.135.50.26 (talk • contribs).

Again, I don't remove anything from my talk page. I do, however, censor foul langage. It's really not needed all that much :-D --omtay 38 14:30, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It annoys me that people like the commenter above do not take the time to use proper capitalization and punctuation. Just a pet peeve. -- Ssilvers 14:41, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yah, I'm also annoyed by his word choice. I mean, using words like Fred and Cafeterias when they really don't make sense... :-) --omtay 38 14:44, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I must admit he got some skills. Too bad he'll have to spend them elsewhere :) -- lucasbfr ^talk 20:25, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Village he lives in just called, they can't find their idiot! :D Hdayejr 14:34, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, look ye, lad. I'm an admin here. This troll's threatening to keep attacking you using proxies, so if anything like this happens again, just let me know, aye? Adam Cuerden ^talk 17:04, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Barnstar of a lot of vandalism
		For your funny comment in this AfD, and for your equally funny comment directed at the profane user who just cussed you out above, Ten Pound Hammer and his otters award you the Barnstar of Good Humor. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 21:23, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you for your support in my successful RfA. I appreciate the trust you and the WP community have in me. Carlossuarez46 22:25, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Barnstar of Patience
		For all the vandalism you continue to take...with a smile. You, sir, have patience. -bassman600

Letting you know....

I've abducted several design elements of your userspace for my own. I apparently have no creativity, myself. Enjoy your vay-kay.... — Music Maker 5376 08:29, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you approve! Just wondering, though, if you know of any more of those lively little icons? I had a specific one in mind, but no longer recall what it was.... And I also enjoyed your snazzy status indicator, and wanted one of my own, but it appeared like you had to update it yourself, which I have very little desire to do. Is this true, or was I misunderstanding something? — Music Maker 5376 18:09, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See? I was definitely right in crowning you the code god.... — Music Maker 5376 13:25, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bah, bah, bah.... Not seeing any buttons near the logout link. I have Twinkle, could that be interfering? You can take a look at my subpages if you'd like.... — Music Maker 5376 02:35, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet. 'Tis the bees' knees! — Music Maker 5376 03:47, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question

What script do you use for your online/offline thing? At first i thought you used Misza13's Status Switcher Script, but you dont have a StatusTemplate page and the code on your Status page is differnt than misza's. Please give me a link, thanks! EvilHom3r 00:09, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Collaboration of the Month

We have agreement by three editors on a COOM for Sept. Please take a look and see how you want ot run it: I'm thinking that we should copy the names of the stubs agreed on into the COOM page and then notify all active musical theatre members? -- Ssilvers 20:38, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:West-End-Chicago-The-Musical-Marquee.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:West-End-Chicago-The-Musical-Marquee.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 17:53, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:StreetcarDesire.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:StreetcarDesire.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:42, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WPMT Roll Call and COTM

WPMT Roll Call and Collaboration of the Month!

You're receiving this message because you are currently listed as a member of WikiProject Musical Theatre. Please post at the talk page to let us know if you're still with the project. Feel free to post on the talk page about what musical theatre-related work you're doing or to weigh in on the current discussions on the talk page.

Nominations for our Collaboration of the Month are currently being accepted. What should we focus on for the month of November? Any input would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks much, folks! Happy editing! — Music Maker 5376 04:55, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Code attention

Hey, man. I know you're busy with school and all (read: drinking and enjoying life), but if you could take a look at the code for {{WPMT Sidebar}}, I'd appreciate it. When you go to expand the section on statistics, it gives all kinds of crazy stuff, and I don't know what's causing it. Thanks! — Music Maker 5376 18:44, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Chicago--A-Musical-Vaudeville-CD-Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Chicago--A-Musical-Vaudeville-CD-Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:16, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added a fair use summary. -- Ssilvers 17:27, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. Any time, man! Hope you're enjoying/doing well at school. Lookin' forward to seeing you again when school's out. All the best, -- Ssilvers 04:19, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:West-End-Chicago-The-Musical-Marquee.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:West-End-Chicago-The-Musical-Marquee.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:07, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:West-End-Chicago-The-Musical-Marquee.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:West-End-Chicago-The-Musical-Marquee.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 04:18, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:DHS Warrior Logo.svg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:DHS Warrior Logo.svg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Zedla 03:23, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Hey, two welcomes are much better than one. Thanks a lot. :) -Yamanbaiia (talk) 12:43, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for putting the role lists up for deletion. -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:20, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WPMT Welcome

The welcome template is on our template page, if you'd like to use it. Just remember to subst it. — Music Maker 5376 00:48, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome

Glad to be aboard the project.Thomprod (talk) 01:56, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:All American CD Cover.png

Thanks for uploading Image:All American CD Cover.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nav menu

GRRR.... I tried it, and it didn't work, and now my popups don't work.... Can I implore you to fiddle with my monobook? — Music Maker 5376 20:30, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war

Thanks for the intervention! (it was nothing if not an intervention) I know the rules apply equally to all parties--if they didn't, they wouldn't be rules, they would be advantages. Mickhunt (talk) 21:23, 7 January 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mickhunt (talk • contribs) 21:16, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mick H. Jan 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mickhunt (talk • contribs) 21:03, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you EAt POOP

Go eat some poop.

Eat Poop

A note to editors reading my talk page

You may be thinking to yourself, "Self, why does omtay have this statement on his talk page?" Well, oh humble editor, you may be unaware of the fact that I do not delete any message from my talk page...ever. Feel free to check in my Archives if you do not believe me. So, as a result, this vandalism above will sit here for infinity.

On a side note, I would suggest against viewing the linked youtube video. It has a very graphical demonstration of Coprophagia on it which may cause one to experience tasting their previous meal again.

Cheers --omtay 38 00:07, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Louise Bérubé

I've declined the speedy tag you placed on Louise Bérubé. The reason is:

The article doesn't appear on French Wikipedia. According to CSD A2, it only applies if the article "exist on another Wikimedia project".

For your information, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:37, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okiedokie, thanks. --omtay 38 19:31, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]