User talk:OneSmartGuy22

May 2022

Hello, I'm Lol1VNIO. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Outfit7—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ~~ lol1VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me • contribs) 15:28, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Outfit7, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. See these articles https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/feb/18/talking-angela-app-children-safety https://hacked.com/is-my-talking-tom-friends-safe/ https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2019/may/14/viral-image/no-talking-angela-app-isnt-secretly-taking-your-ch/ https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2014/02/21/the-talking-angela-witch-hunt-what-on-earth-is-going-on/ Tube·of·Light 16:16, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don’t mention Outfit7 again

Unless it’s to apologise for spreading lies. I’ll block you if you do. Doug Weller talk 18:39, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller I said what I heard about this company... From my point of perspective none of the things I said were lies. I said what I heard and sincerlly, if those things were to be true, they needed to be known. I apologise for my mistake and I will make sure it won't happen again. OneSmartGuy22 (talk) 15:45, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good. Doug Weller talk 15:50, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain your edit saying “Jesus is so holy” on a blocked editor’s talk page

User talk:JDMayweather because after seeing that I see no reason not to block you. Doug Weller talk 19:10, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller I said Jesus is so holy because he is holy. OneSmartGuy22 (talk) 15:39, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's not an explanation at all. Doug Weller talk 15:45, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller What happens if you block me? (not ironic) OneSmartGuy22 (talk) 15:46, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You won't be able to edit. And I'm one of the few Administrators who can tell if someone has created a new account or is editing from an IP. Doug Weller talk 15:51, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller It's a code OneSmartGuy22 (talk) 15:56, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller You can block me if you want, Idrk about it. Anyways when I am editing on Wikipedia I just corect the grammar or update the info so yeah. You can block me if you want. OneSmartGuy22 (talk) 16:02, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Doug Weller talk 19:24, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller Hello HorrorRemover (talk) 14:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller I would like to report an article. It is called "Russian sleep experiment" and I think it should have a disclaimer in the title that says it is 18+ or even deleted. I find it very disturbing for kids and it is not even constructive, as it is about a creepypasta. I hope you will do something about this article so that it doesn't happen the same as it happened to me to other people. HorrorRemover (talk) 14:55, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller This article is simply horror. I think the best choice is to delete it. Thank you for reading. HorrorRemover (talk) 14:56, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly that's not possible. There would have to be agreement that there were no reliable sources for it, and there are a lot. Doug Weller talk 15:06, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller Then could you put a warning that it is horror? HorrorRemover (talk) 15:16, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller In the title HorrorRemover (talk) 15:16, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are you OneSmartGuy? Doug Weller talk 15:39, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller Yes I am. But I think this time I didn't do anyhting wrong OneSmartGuy22 (talk) 16:39, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 19:24, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/OneSmartGuy22. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:51, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@RoySmith I did multiple accounts because I wanted to say that an article is pretty horror, and not constructive, to a mod. And, when I got banned on the first account I was just experimenting... I know it is bad now, but come on, I just said "Jesus is so holy", nothing bad. Anyways I am sorry and I am gonna shut up because I know how much you hate me. OneSmartGuy22 (talk) 09:17, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@RoySmith Hello, I wanna ask if I could be unblocked. I was blocked because I did something stupid, but I learned my lesson and what is good or bad. Please, give me another chance, and I will show that I deserve it. And if I do something that you consider bad, block me forever. Thanks for reading, Goodbye. OneSmartGuy22 (talk) 11:02, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll leave it to another admin to make the final decision, but from a CU perspective, I just ran some more checks and don't see any evidence of further socking. Any admin should consider the requirement to consult a CU to be satisfied and feel free to unblock if they think it appropriate. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:50, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@RoySmith Hello, could you unblock me? I didnt do anything bad in a year OneSmartGuy22 (talk) 12:50, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have run some checks and can find no evidence of sockpuppetry currently going on. I did find one other account using the same IP, but it has zero edits on enwiki and was created on another project. In consultation with some other CUs off-wiki, we've come to the conclusion that it's probably not a sock. I'm going to unblock this account in a moment, but you do need to understand that the reason you are being unblocked is to give you a chance to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. If you go back to the kind of disruptive editing you were doing in the past, you'll just end up getting blocked again and unlikely to find any sympathy for another unblock. RoySmith (talk) 02:16, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@RoySmith Okay, thank you!! OneSmartGuy22 (talk) 06:19, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]