User talk:Mrsodha

May 2020

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:33, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: OpanHost (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SamHolt6 were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unambiguous advertising, and lacks any in-line citations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OpanHost and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:OpanHost, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 21:45, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Opanhost! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SamHolt6 (talk) 21:45, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:OpanHost

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:OpanHost, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. creffett (talk) 23:05, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry

Hello sir, Recently i created a Wikipedia page for OpanHost that is blocked by unambiguous advertising reason. I'm new to Wikipedia so i don't know that external URL to service not allowed so sorry I'm promise to you this will never happen again. I'm requesting 🙏🙏 to you please unblock this page username so I can edit whole article again and make sure this time no links to external website. Also sorry for very late reply because I'm very new to Wikipedia so I don't know how to reach you after some research on Google i found this method to contact you. I hope you understand thanks in advance sir. Opanhost (talk) 12:32, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mrsodha (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

mrsodha (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I'm new to Wikipedia and now i understand why I'm blocked due to username policy or promotion article. I will make sure this will never happen again sorry and please unblock me. Thanks

Decline reason:

You forgot to address your violations of WP:COI and you forgot to tell us what you'd write about instead. Yamla (talk) 14:18, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Sir Yes it's seems like WP:COI but it's not because I'm not belongs to OpanHost it's my first review about the hosting company. I also researching on other companies, blogs, temples & places in india. You see like this because of username but as i told before I'm new to Wikipedia so I don't know which username for article of profile so it's happen by mistake. Now I will start writing about temples of india first. Then review other blog's, website and helping in updates of articles. T Thanks Opanhost (talk) 19:26, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mrsodha (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry Sir Yes it's seems like WP:COI but it's not because I'm not belongs to OpanHost it's my first review about the hosting company. I also researching on other companies, blogs, temples & places in india. You see like this because of username but as i told before I'm new to Wikipedia so I don't know which username for article of profile so it's happen by mistake. Now I will start writing about temples of india first. Then review other blog's, website and helping in updates of articles. Thanks

Decline reason:

User has been renamed, but has not addressed concerns about COI editing in coherent terms. only (talk) 01:15, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) Your unblock request doesn't really explain why your attempted artcle was an obvious and unambiguous advertisement. It would behove you to explain this, if you do "not belongs to OpanHost". —Wasell^(T) 16:21, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW User:Deepfriedokra/promo renamed unblock --Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 23:19, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

globally renamed Opanhost to Mrsodha

globally renamed Opanhost to Mrsodha --Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 23:17, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]