User talk:OrdinaryContributor

This is OrdinaryContributor's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: 23 March 1933 Reichstag speech (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:23 March 1933 Reichstag speech and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:20, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They're the exact same sources listed in the German version of the article I translated, and that version is up. If you're not going to approve this, take down the German article as well, then, using that reasoning. OrdinaryContributor (talk) 23:54, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed I forgot the separate citations section, which has been added now. The reference is now also properly linked with the citation. OrdinaryContributor (talk) 00:11, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OrdinaryContributor! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:20, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 23 March 1933 Reichstag speech (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

Needs inline citations

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:23 March 1933 Reichstag speech and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 00:19, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 23 March 1933 Reichstag speech (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:23 March 1933 Reichstag speech and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 00:22, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 23 March 1933 Reichstag speech (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tagishsimon was:

The article is poorly referenced. By & large, each paragraph is expected to have a comprehensible reference. Until that happens it will not progress.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:23 March 1933 Reichstag speech and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tagishsimon (talk) 00:36, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Wikipedia:Teahouse. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. If you persist as you have started at Wikipedia:Teahouse you will be blocked without further notice. Your conduct on that page was disgusting. Tagishsimon (talk) 00:37, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Thank you very much! ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 00:44, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 01:17, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:39, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This just goes to show the obvious political bias and censorship inherent here - which will make headlines. OrdinaryContributor (talk) 01:41, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Of course some (Personal attack removed) would ban someone from Wikipedia over this article. OrdinaryContributor (talk) 01:44, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Canvassing on users' talk pages

Please do not leave messages on several users' talk pages requesting something about your article, as this is considered canvassing. Thanks. — 64andtim (chat • see here) 01:40, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was reporting censorship and abuse of editorial powers by your politically-biased staff, hello? OrdinaryContributor (talk) 01:45, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not censorship to require proper sourcing, especially when it comes to a sensitive topic like a speech by Hitler! See WP:V. It doesn't matter whether the German Wikipedia allowed it - they may have missed the problems but we're not bound by the same rules in any case. The languages are independent projects. The draft here is promising, but instead of putting in the work to find sources to back up the content you've reacted in a totally over-the-top fashion and got yourself blocked. Fences&Windows 12:33, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

-- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|she) 01:48, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]