User talk:Orororo

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Orororo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How can be resolved problem with block? Can I just put an article without image? Though nobody is against of me using this image. That was kind of gift. May be I can prove it in some way. I don't understand what to do now. Orororo (talk) 12:00, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sorry, no. You are clearly here to promote the subject, clearly have a conflict of interest, and give the impression of undeclared paid editing. Please read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID. Please tell us what other, unconnected subjects you would edit about. I, for one, would not unblock you if your only purpose is to edit about the subject of Draft:Jose David Chaparro Martinez .-- Deep fried okra 09:31, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jose David Chaparro Martinez (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jose David Chaparro Martinez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jose David Chaparro Martinez, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 13:23, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Orororo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 13:23, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Jose David Chaparro Martinez

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Jose David Chaparro Martinez, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. creffett (talk) 23:28, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, Orororo. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See WP:PAID. Thank you. – Athaenara ✉ 05:06, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

– Athaenara ✉ 05:06, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Orororo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There's no any advertisement in article. I'm private person, not working for company non for person. It's just article about personality. I can rewrite it in another way. Orororo (talk) 12:00, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What is your association with Mr Martinez? Have you meet him personally, as implied by File:Хосе Давид Чапарро Мартинез.jpg? MER-C 16:04, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Orororo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know him personally, only through his classmates in Ukraine. I've got permission on using File:Хосе Давид Чапарро Мартинез.jpg from one of them for wikipedia only. I've read some of articles of Mr Jose David Chaparro Martinez. It's allowed to write an article about businessman with such a great work experience. Orororo (talk) 15:18, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is a serious problem. Lying about the source of an image is a violation of WP:COPYRIGHT and places the entire project in jeopardy. Additionally, it makes it all but impossible to trust your word now, given that you went out of your way to mislead us in the past. Yamla (talk) 13:13, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So then, why did you claim the photo to be your own work? Were you paid to write this article? MER-C 16:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Orororo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It seems to me that we are just walking around. I didn't put any personal point of view in article, any prejudiced opinions. I don't work for the subject's company, I'm not paid for this article. If i'll find an interesting theme for article I try to edit about it. But how can i do it when i'm blocked??? Orororo (talk) 08:30, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In your previous unblock request you seemed to indicate you had misrepresented the origin of an image in violation of WP:COPYVIO and have not, in your most current unblock request, indicated you understand Wikipedia's copyright and image upload policies. (You also did not indicate, in specific terms, a legitimate need to have a working Wikipedia account [i.e. what specific edits or contributions you plan to work on if unblocked]).
Copyright violations place the entire project in jeopardy, ergo, editors who upload images without an understanding of COPYVIO place the entire project in jeopardy. As a result, continued blocking of this account is of critical necessity to "prevent imminent or continuing damage and disruption to Wikipedia" as per WP:BLOCKP. Regretfully, I am therefore required to decline your unblock request. Your interest in supporting Wikipedia is noted and appreciated. You should feel free to continue participating in the Wikipedia project as a non-editing reader of WP articles or as a donor to the Wikimedia Foundation. Thank you! Chetsford (talk) 20:59, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock discussion

You still have not addressed the reasons for your block. You do not need to be able to edit to tell us what constructive, non-PAID, non-COI edits you might make. -- Deep fried okra 10:38, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]