User talk:PK650/Archives/2022/February
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:PK650. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
February with Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Ponsse
Hello PK650! Back in March 2020 you added a tag on Ponsse's article. Could you please evaluate, if it is still needed? Jjanhone (talk) 16:29, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Jjanhone: Hi. Thank you for getting in touch. I removed the "sources exist" given the article is now big enough its sources provide enough evidence of notability. I strongly urge you to go over our conflict of interest policy and not edit the article yourself if you're being paid for it, as per our terms of service. I am unable to remove the other tags at this time, but feel free to request help in doing so if, again, you're being paid. PK650 (talk) 20:45, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! See a request edit I made in October. No answers in four months is like whispering wishes in the wind. Maybe there is not enough volunteers handling the requests or none of them is interested in Konecranes. Hard to know. And speaking of Ponsse, there's also a request edit on its Talk page left unanswered for nearly two years now. Jjanhone (talk) 07:30, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- Unfortunately there are only a handful of editors actively involved in requested edits. I can go over some of what you've mentioned, but please consider relevant policies, particularly those concerning COI and also the use of accounts. PK650 (talk) 00:55, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! See a request edit I made in October. No answers in four months is like whispering wishes in the wind. Maybe there is not enough volunteers handling the requests or none of them is interested in Konecranes. Hard to know. And speaking of Ponsse, there's also a request edit on its Talk page left unanswered for nearly two years now. Jjanhone (talk) 07:30, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
WP:AFC Helper News
Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.
- AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
- The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.
Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Another Ponsse request
Hello PK650! Last month I wrote you about a tag you had added on Ponsse article. There was also another user who had left tags on the article. Since the user is on a wiki break now I'm asking if you could evaluate the status about these other tags too. The another connected contributor has now added his COI on the article so I think that at least "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. (April 2020)" could now be removed? Jjanhone (talk) 15:05, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
March editathons
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging