User talk:Pacolesa

This is Pacolesa's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are no references at all.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Pacolesa/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:08, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Pacolesa, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:08, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...About four months ago, when I started my post, I was asked to show verifiable proofs of legitimacy, which I did send, and it was approved by Wikipedia:

Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).The Ultimate Goal, title by the author´s book, was published by OutskirtsPress.com (Juvenile/Nonfiction School&Education / ISBN 978-1-4327-5844-8 COPYRIGHT 2010 Francisco Guerrero.

Thank you, and congratulations on your service to the world community!Pacolesa (talk) 15:44, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pacolesa (talk) 15:44, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pacolesa. I've reviewed your contributions and I could not find where you sent your reliable sources. I should note that the advice given to you at User:Pacolesa/sandbox was not to find proof of legitimacy. The reviewing editor said you need to provide references. I would suggest you carefully read WP:FIRSTARTICLE. There are a number of things a new article requires. First and foremost it needs to meet our guidelines on notability. Just because something exists or has even been published, does not necessarily mean it should have its own article here on the English Wikipedia. The way we establish this is by demonstrating that multiple independent publications have discussed the topic or individual in depth. In depth meaning beyond routine coverage in a category and where the topic has been the central aspect of the coverage (no passing mentions). Secondly, all the information in the article should be supported by inline references. Essentially every fact or statement in the article should be able to be verified by other sources. For example, the draft you submitted states the individual has "8 children, and 16 grand children". You will need to provide an inline reference to support that statement. These inline statements will need to be formatted in the correct way. I've already given you quite a bit of reading material to look over. If you require any further help, you can ask questions at the WP:TEAHOUSE. Mkdw ^talk 16:31, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]