User talk:Papa Lima Whiskey 2
Welcome
[edit]
|
POTD notification
[edit].jpg)
Hi PLW,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Africa (satellite image).jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on December 15, 2011. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2011-12-15. howcheng {chat} 18:06, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
POTD notification
[edit]
Hi PLW,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Phelsuma-laticauda-Saint-Denis.JPG is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on December 23, 2011. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2011-12-23. howcheng {chat} 18:43, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
POTD notification
[edit]
Hi PLW,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Bufo melanosticus 01.JPG is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on January 3, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-01-03. howcheng {chat} 22:39, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
POTD notification
[edit]
Hi PLW,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Pine grosbeak17g.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on January 10, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-01-10. howcheng {chat} 21:02, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Re:Overturned delist decision where quorum/minimum delist votes criterion not satisfied
[edit]Please see my comments on User talk:Makeemlighter. Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates would be the appropriate place to open a discussion if you wish to continue this. J Milburn (talk) 15:10, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Re:Community input required: lowering delist bar at FPC
[edit]That message you're sending around is utter bullshit. It is no way neutrally worded, and is clearly a violation of the guidelines on canvassing. You make quite clear that what you're talking about here is some people choosing to ignore "the rules", and then some supporting abolishing "the rules". What has actually happened is that you and Julia have become annoyed that the current practice does not reflect the way you like it done, and then gotten annoyed when someone tried to update the rules (which should be descriptive, not prescriptive) to reflect the fact that current practice is different. Also, I can only assume it's a complete coincidence that you decided to call for wider input when you realised that the majority of people do not agree with your scheme. J Milburn (talk) 23:57, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
- You should be grateful as any decision that runs counter to the large scale consensus previously obtained wouldn't be believable if it's based on only three of you giving input. Next thing, you'll tell me that those people wouldn't be affected, which they will be. Everyone that's part of the project. As for paranoia, hearsay and bad faith, ... Papa Lima Whiskey 2 (talk) 07:57, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- I should be grateful? Thank you, oh merciful lord. Seriously, pull the other one. You're mischaracterising an argument (an argument you started, and an argument in which you're veru much the minority view) and canvassing for support. That's against policy. There's not really anything to debate or discuss here. J Milburn (talk) 13:21, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- It's neutrally phrased, but I suppose taking your position, I should accuse you of complaining only because things didn't go your way. But let's not manipulate history: I merely noticed an unorthodox closure and piped up about it. The rest of you then went with trying to shake up the whole system that, as I'll keep repeating, was actually running perfectly happily before, and would have continued doing so in the absence of your side's inability to resist the temptation to reintroduce bias and oligarchy. Papa Lima Whiskey 2 (talk) 14:28, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- I'm going to assume you genuinely are delusional here, rather than just a troll. Let me explain, once again, how wrong you are. I will put it in nice simple bullet points for you.
- It was not neutrally worded. If you can't see that, I can't convince you. Just take my word for it. If you genuinely want me to explain it, ask, and I will. I can show you, but I can't make you see.
- I am "complaining" because you are violating policy in an attempt to turn a debate your way. That seems to be a pretty legitimate reason to "complain".
- You noticed a closure which is contrary to how you like it. As has been demonstrated, there have been numerous closures in that manner in recent months- the practice has changed. It was not the closure which was aberrant, it was your view of it.
- No one started to shake up the system. The system was already adapting, it was you who saw fit to create drama, because you were not happy with how it was adapting. This is no kind of "J Milburn and his cronies trying to change things"- it's you who's trying to change things.
- It was not running happily, it was a fucking mess. It was incredibly difficult to get anything delisted, no matter how obviously the image needed to be delisted. That may be "happy" in your little world, but a lot saw issue with it, as is shown by the attempts to change it.
- There is no "side". A lot of people have a lot of different opinions- I can only assume that a lot of people have similar opinions to me because, firstly, this is how things have been done for some time now, and, secondly, because it mirrors the way just about every other process on Wikipedia works (obviously, no one is agreeing with the notion put forward by me because it's reasonable. As you've already decided, there's absolutely no way it could be reasonable.)
- So far as I am aware, no one is trying to introduce an "oligarchy", or anything even remotely like it. Not once has a notion such as (for instance) "admin-only closure" or "director-only closure" been thrown about; these could be seen as an oligarchy, but how any of the notions put forward by "my" "side" in any way resemble an oligarchy is beyond me.
- If you're genuinely struggling with any of these points, I will explain them. And yes, I am being patronising, because you apparently have absolutely no idea what's going on. J Milburn (talk) 14:45, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- I'm going to assume you genuinely are delusional here, rather than just a troll. Let me explain, once again, how wrong you are. I will put it in nice simple bullet points for you.
- It's neutrally phrased, but I suppose taking your position, I should accuse you of complaining only because things didn't go your way. But let's not manipulate history: I merely noticed an unorthodox closure and piped up about it. The rest of you then went with trying to shake up the whole system that, as I'll keep repeating, was actually running perfectly happily before, and would have continued doing so in the absence of your side's inability to resist the temptation to reintroduce bias and oligarchy. Papa Lima Whiskey 2 (talk) 14:28, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- I should be grateful? Thank you, oh merciful lord. Seriously, pull the other one. You're mischaracterising an argument (an argument you started, and an argument in which you're veru much the minority view) and canvassing for support. That's against policy. There's not really anything to debate or discuss here. J Milburn (talk) 13:21, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Why didn't you address the issue raised by myself?
[edit]Why didn't you address the potential copyright issue raised by myself at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Sukhov, closing the FPC without even saying something? --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 08:38, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
--Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 09:20, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Co-nom
[edit]Hello. I was a co-nom for GG. Can you please put a FP notice on my talk page too, as you did for the other co-nom? Thank you. —Eustress talk 14:42, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
 |
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Mount Everest as seen from Drukair2 PLW edit.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Julia\talk 20:14, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
|
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Dolceacqua43 - Artista locale mentre dipinge un acquarello.jpg
[edit]
 |
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Dolceacqua43 - Artista locale mentre dipinge un acquarello.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Makeemlighter (talk) 23:33, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
|
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Photographer's Barnstar |
| Your contributions are amazing! So many great pictures. Thank you for taking the time to help improve Wikipedia. /-\urelius |)ecimus 20:44, 12 February 2012 (UTC) |
Mezcala Bridge FP category
[edit]Hi, I noticed that you put the Mezcala Bridge under Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Panorama, but when I nominated it I said that the category was Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture. I've added it to Architecture for the moment but I haven't removed it from Panorama. Because the nom stated that the category was Architecture, I think that it should stay there. What do you think? Pine(talk) 22:17, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
- OK, if there are no objections, we can leave it in panoramas. Pine(talk) 05:53, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Accidental revert
[edit]I had no idea what your message was referring to - until I saw that I apparently reverted an edit of yours a few minutes ago. I have no idea how that happened, particularly as I wasn't even looking at the page in question! My apologies (although still confused!) -- Chuq (talk) 10:30, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
WIAFP amendment
[edit]Hello, just letting you know about recently opened Wikipedia talk:Featured picture criteria#Deprecate waiting period. Brandmeister t 21:29, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
POTD notification
[edit]
Hi PLW,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Atlantic Spadefish PLW edit.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 16, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-03-16. —howcheng {chat} 07:47, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
POTD notification
[edit]_brighter_and_quality.jpg)
Hi PLW,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Squilla mantis (l'Ametlla) brighter and quality.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 24, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-03-24. —howcheng {chat} 19:44, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 |
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:James McNeill Whistler - La Princesse du pays de la porcelaine - brighter.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Makeemlighter (talk) 15:21, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
|
Hi, I have uploaded the high-resolution version of the nominated image File:Khalsa Heritage Memorial 176 Edit.jpg. I request you to kindly review the image. Thanks. Sanyambahga (talk) 08:56, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
 |
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Coast Garter Snake.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Makeemlighter (talk) 21:14, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
|
Central Powers Posters
[edit]These three posters are quite nice and can be uploaded locally (for sure). The German grenadier can be uploaded to Commons (PD in EU since 2005). Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:54, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Common Lime Mating
[edit]Hello:
The nomination http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates#Common_Lime_Mating requires additional opinion from you. So, please - Jkadavoor (talk) 06:03, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Goya's The Third of May, 1808: The Execution of the Defenders of Madrid
[edit] |
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:El Tres de Mayo, by Francisco de Goya, from Prado thin black margin.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Julia\talk 06:50, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
|
 |
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Rhinechis scalaris cropped.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Makeemlighter (talk) 21:45, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
|
I'm interested...
[edit]Can you provide a single example of me "persecuting" people leaving neutral notices on project pages, or are you just full of shit? J Milburn (talk) 10:56, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
POTD notification
[edit]
Hi PLW,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Seasquirt.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on April 21, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-04-21. —howcheng {chat} 18:27, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
POTD notification
[edit]
Hi PLW,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Lee Bollinger - Daniella Zalcman less noise.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on April 30, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-04-30. —howcheng {chat} 21:05, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
POTD notification
[edit]_edit.jpg)
Hi PLW,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:William Notman studios - Sitting Bull and Buffalo Bill (1895) edit.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 10, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-05-10. —howcheng {chat} 16:49, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg) |
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Fuyu Persimmon (Diospyros Kaki).jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Makeemlighter (talk) 02:17, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
|
.jpg){kind=link}
POTD notification
[edit]
Hi PLW,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Eustrombus gigas 01.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 7, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-06-07. —howcheng {chat} 19:56, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
FP delist notification
[edit]Please see Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Pulmonata.jpg. Thanks. —howcheng {chat} 16:43, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
POTD notification
[edit]
Hi PLW,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Squid komodo.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 16, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-06-16. —howcheng {chat} 16:42, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
POTD notification
[edit].jpg)
Hi PLW,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Eucidaris tribuloides (Slate-pencil Urchin).jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on July 19, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-07-19. —howcheng {chat} 18:05, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
POTD notification
[edit]
Hi PLW,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Haeckel Calcispongiae.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on August 4, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-08-04. —howcheng {chat} 16:35, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
POTD notification
[edit]
Hi PLW,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Chaetodon melannotus edit4.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on September 20, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-09-20. —howcheng {chat} 16:44, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
POTD notification
[edit]
Hi PLW,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Fridtjof Nansen LOC 03377u-3.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on October 10, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-10-10. —howcheng {chat} 16:46, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
POTD notification
[edit].jpg)
Hi PLW,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Balistapus undulatus (Nausicaä).jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on October 27, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-10-27. —howcheng {chat} 23:11, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
POTD notification
[edit]_edit.jpg)
Hi PLW,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Amadina erythrocephala (l) edit.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on October 28, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-10-28. That's two in a row for you! —howcheng {chat} 11:13, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Matt Bomer Infobox photo consensus discussion
[edit]Hi. Your opinion is requested in this discussion.
If you're in an area that was affected by Hurricane Sandy, and are unable to reply, I hope that you have not suffered too greatly, and my best wishes go out to you. Nightscream (talk) 22:49, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
POTD notification
[edit]Hi PLW2,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Dolceacqua43 - Artista locale mentre dipinge un acquarello.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 29, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-05-29. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:01, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
POTD notification
[edit]Hi PLW2,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Mount Everest as seen from Drukair2 PLW edit.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 02, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-06-02. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:51, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
POTD notification
[edit]Hi PLW2,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Coast Garter Snake.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on July 5, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-07-05. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:25, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
POTD notification
[edit]Hi PLW2,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:James McNeill Whistler - La Princesse du pays de la porcelaine - brighter.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on July 22, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-07-22. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:16, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
POTD notification
[edit]Hi PLW2,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Fuyu Persimmon (Diospyros Kaki).jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on July 31, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-07-31. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:23, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
POTD notification
[edit]Hi PLW2,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:El Tres de Mayo, by Francisco de Goya, from Prado thin black margin.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 3, 2014. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2014-05-03. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:01, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
 |
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Inuit Woman 1907 Crisco edit 2.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 10:40, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
|
POTD notification
[edit]Hi PLW,
Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Inuit Woman 1907 Crisco edit 2.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on November 12, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2016-11-12. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:52, 29 October 2016 (UTC)