User talk:Patrick21london

Reply

Hi Patrick, just wanted to make sure you saw my reply to you on my Talk page. Cheers, Jessicapierce (talk) 18:01, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dune Drifter (April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dune Drifter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dune Drifter, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:32, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To Theroadislong-Wikipedia reviewer.

Why has my Dune Drifter article been rejected? I have included two references two external websites supporting the existence of the film. Can you give examples of what more is needed to enable this article to be published on Wikipedia? Wikipedia says that the Plot text can be independent of references. Could I have help with my article please? From Patrick Lee, United Kingdom, 25 April 2022. Patrick21london (talk) 23:07, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To Theroadislong-Wikipedia reviewer. I have now added six references to prove that Dune Drifter was praised, in 2020, as a good science fiction film despite its low budget, and therefore this film is worthy of having an entry on Wikipedia. From Patrick Lee, United Kingdom, 25 April 2022. Patrick21london (talk) 23:48, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To Theroadislong-Wikipedia reviewer. I have now added six references to prove that Dune Drifter was praised, in 2020, as a good science fiction film despite its low budget, and therefore this film by Marc Price, is worthy of having an entry on Wikipedia. From Patrick Lee, United Kingdom, 25 April 2022. Patrick21london (talk) 23:50, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To Wikipedia reviewer. I have now added thirteen references to prove that Dune Drifter was praised, in 2020, as a good science fiction film, despite its low budget. Therefore this film is note-worthy of having an entry on Wikipedia. From Patrick Lee, United Kingdom, 1 May 2022. Patrick21london (talk) 22:25, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Patrick21london! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 20:32, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dune Drifter (August 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dune Drifter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 00:49, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To SL93. I do not agree with you rejecting my Dune Drifter article for publication in Wikipedia. I have already listed 15 X references including published internet articles that actually reviewed the film Dune Drifter, in 2020. So not just passing references. This film was praised by critics at the time. Therefore my article deserves to be published on Wikipedia. I wish to re-submit this for publication. Can you give a specific suggestion on what else I should add? From Patrick Lee, United Kingdom, 7 August 2022. Patrick21london (talk) 16:16, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dune Drifter (October 31)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Resubmitted without improvement and as noted in previous review sources do not support notability.

S0091 (talk) 16:21, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To Wikipedia. I have re-published my article about the science fiction film Dune Drifter, with improvements to the text, which does deserve to be published in Wikipedia. I have added references to show that this film was praised by film critics, and it was spoken of a year after it was released. From Patrick Lee, United Kingdom, 26 November 2022. Patrick21london (talk) 13:39, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dune Drifter

Hello, Patrick21london. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dune Drifter, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dune Drifter

Hello, Patrick21london. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dune Drifter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:40, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]