User talk:PavelBrunki

February 2023

Hello PavelBrunki. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Antonio Paone, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:PavelBrunki. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=PavelBrunki|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 15:51, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:PavelBrunki, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=PavelBrunki|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 17:29, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 10:41, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon dear editor

1.I want to improve and fill wikipedia with correct and updated articles

2. Make better articles for people who read it like me.

3. No financial interest at all PavelBrunki (talk) 12:25, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How were you aware of Draft:Ruslan Sukhiy? It's not easy to find a draft you didn't create unless you already know about it. The more honest you are, the more we can help. 331dot (talk) 14:16, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear 331dot.

1. I've been working with Ruslan Sukhiy for many years on the website.

I made his site https://ruslan-sukhiy.ru/ and I support it.

2. I want people to get truthful articles from wikipedia

I want Wikipedia to be better, more complete and with as much honest and complete information as possible.

3. Help make the wikipedia articles better. PavelBrunki (talk) 10:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you work for Ruslan Sukhiy, you meet the definition of a paid editor, you do not have to be specifically paid to edit. Do you also work with Antonio Paone? 331dot (talk) 10:23, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Russian Word (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at New Russian Word instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Russian Word and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:54, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PavelBrunki! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:54, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Sam Kuru (talk) 21:36, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The edits at Draft:Nina Verkoeyen are obvious SEO/PR. You've been warned about undisclosed paid editing and COI before. Sam Kuru (talk) 21:36, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nina Verkoeyen

Hello, PavelBrunki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nina Verkoeyen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:58, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]