User talk:Pensativa

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Pensativa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 03:42, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in What's Going On, makes articles harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 12:50, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello, when you make an edit to an article, it is helpful to other editors if you would fill in the edit summary box to explain the point of your edit. Victor Silvester is on my watchlist, and if you had put something like "minor tweaks to references" I need not have gone to the article to see what you had done to it. Thanks -- Alarics (talk) 06:29, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Historical Black Press Foundation

I have nominated this article for deletion which you significantly edited recently. If you have any concerns or comments regarding the article, feel free to voice them at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Historical Black Press Foundation. SwisterTwister talk 02:16, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

James Berry

Thanks for your work on James Berry. I have removed the piece about "He is regarded as one of the first black writers in Britain to gain wide recognition for his work." as it is repeating inaccurate information. I was shocked that the BL put out such a statement, but I feel it would only be relevant to include this material if the matter became the subject of further debate.Leutha (talk) 20:56, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, understood! Pensativa (talk)

A cookie for you!

Hello! Thanks for your help on the Wiki. - by Kevin12cd... Tell me how I'm doing on my Talkpage! 01:26, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! Pensativa (talk) 15:24, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cresset Press

Hi, It's good to see this expanded! I created the stub while stub-sorting Cresset and following up various related bits and pieces, the way one does. Thanks. PamD 17:33, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help. Happy New Year! Pensativa (talk) 10:04, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good work on the Ernest Ranglin article

Cheers for tightening up the Ranglin article. I've changed one sentence about Millie's hit (Island Records didn't go worldwide until 1971 so changed sentence to reflect that). Also changed the Wrigglers album (tacitly understood that Ranglin was on guitar duties) - and don't want to give the album too much prominence. It is a hotel floor show.

Sluffs (talk) 17:01, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Respect! Pensativa (talk) 17:43, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on Halliday!

Thank you. Are you a linguist? A systemic function grammar person? If so, we could use your assistance. I'm only an amateur in both. Tony (talk) 07:00, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just an editor! Pensativa (talk)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pensativa. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]