User talk:MotorsportPete93
Hello, and welcome to my talk page. Feel free to make any suggestions or ask any questions here. I will always try to reply on your talk page. Just click new section above to make a new comment.
Magyar Nagydíj
[edit]Hey, I restored those edits I made to the 2012 F1 season page. I just don't think it's necessary to have two columns in the calendar, one for the race title and one for the Grand Prix. I understand your concerns about the use of "Magyar Nagydíj" in the table, but it is in a column with nineteen other Grands Prix. Five more of these - Spain, Canada, Germany, Italy and Brazil - are also in their local language. Furthermore, the "Magyar Nagydíj" links straight to the Hungarian Grand Prix page. Even holding the cursor over the flag icon will reveal that it is Hungary. Taken in isolation, it could certainly be an issue. But I feel that because it is in a table with the other Grands Prix, and because it links to the relevant article, its use is acceptable.
Even if we could not use the name "Magyar Nagydíj", I still think two columns is unnecessary. I don't really see the importance of listing the race's title sponsor. Does it really matter if Qantas or Foster's sponsors the Austrealian Grand Prix? Does the sponsor actually affect the race, or the season? We use the title sponsors of each team because those sponsors often form the basis of the car liveries, thereby making them easier to idnetify. But the title sponsors of the races don't really affect things. And if you take the title sponsors out, all you've really got is two columns dedicated to the same thing: the name of the race. I don't think clariying the name "Magyar Nagydíj" is enough to justify a second column (especially given the way it is presented), and I don't think leaving the race sponsors in the column is notable enough for it. I could maybe agree on the positioning of the flag icons for each race, but I just don't see the need for having two columns and/or the title sponsor of a race. I think there are some things - like the number of laps in the race - that are far more notable. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 23:31, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- Well, I'm happy with either - local names, or English names. I just don't think the title sponsor warrants a mention, particularly when other details like the number of laps go unsaid.
- I also think the flag icon should go before the race rather than the circuit, largely because we've had races assigned to circuits that are not necessarily in the same country - Imola being the prime example. It was billed as the San Marino Grand Prix, but the circuit is in Italy. This may require us to re-think out position on the flag for Valencia, through. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 02:28, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- These are old issues Prisonmonkeys. Flags go to the circuit to stop nonsense like Supernational and subnational flags being used to denote races like European Grand Prix or Detriot Grand Prix. Also number of laps has norelvance to the calendar. Also an old issue long ago resolved. --Falcadore (talk) 03:10, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Caterham & Team Lotus
[edit]Why did you split up Team Lotus and Caterham? They're still the same team with the same staff and ownership, plus licenses. And we haven't heard from the FIA whether Caterham is a completely new team from Team Lotus. I don't think we can just create our own standards and supercede the FIA (though they have no control over wikipedia), but I don't feel its ethically right. So I'm in favor of dropping the Team Lotus 2011 article and putting it back with Caterham, but I'm just asking what consensus and decision making was made to warrant splitting two teams into four pages.Gaeaman787 (talk) 16:21, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Renault F1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
The wackiness of Lotus
[edit]With this whole debacle over Lotus/Caterham and Lotus Renault to just being Lotus. All F1 info for some reason counts Lotus F1 as a continuation of the original Lotus from Colin Chapman, so that's out. Does creating a new page for a f1 team relate to who exactly owns it, or is it as Prisonermonkeys said in that all the team needs to do is change its official trading name and its a new team. I don't think that Lotus F1, Caterham, and Marussia had to pay the entry fee for new teams. Gaeaman787 (talk) 22:43, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:CaterhamF1logo.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:CaterhamF1logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 18:31, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 4
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Dominik Kraihamer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oberndorf (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 11
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Matthieu Lahaye, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Judd and Pescarolo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 6
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Grégoire Demoustier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corvette Z06 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
|
Invitation to diacritics guideline discussion at WT:BLP |
| Hi, you were one of 100+ Users who has commented on a living person Requested Move featuring diacritics (e.g. the é in Beyoncé Knowles) in the last 30 days. Following closure of Talk:Stephane Huet RM, a tightening of BLP guidelines is proposed. Your contribution is invited to WT:BLP to discuss drafting a proposal for tightening BLP accuracy guidelines for names. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:04, 20 April 2012 (UTC) |
Feel free to duplicate this invite on the pages of others who have commented, for or against. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:24, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
WP Motorsport in the Signpost
[edit]The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Motorsport for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 16:01, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Tune Group for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tune Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tune Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Banner talk 15:36, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 27
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nicolas Bernardi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:MonsterWRTlogo.png)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:MonsterWRTlogo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free media (File:Superstars Series logo.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading File:Superstars Series logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:15, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Category:Ginetta Cars
[edit]Category:Ginetta Cars, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 16:03, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
2009 Race of Champions
[edit]Hello MotorsportPete93. I just came across an article you created admittedly a few years ago, but I thought I would ask the question.
Is it just me or does the article lead make no effort to describe what the Race of Champions is? I see no mention of motor racing or motorsport anywhere in the lead apart from stating racing drivers compete in it. But what do they do? Open letters? Play scrabble? Identify breakfast cereals while blindfolded?
Article leads should always provide a basic description of what an event is. Might it be possible to look into this and other articles (of which I do not know which they are) where you may have overlooked a description of the event instead of labelling it, saying where it was held and suggest who might have competed. A good list of secondary characteristics to be sure, but it omits the primary - what is it?
Thank you for your time. --Falcadore (talk) 01:39, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Scuderia Coloni
[edit]Hi. Just letting you know the merge you commented on at Talk:Scuderia Coloni has been done, bringing in material from the Enzo Colini Racing Car Systems page. I did the merge but make no claim to any expertise in motorsports, so apologies for any accidental inaccuracies I may have introduced. I notice you're not around much any more, but if you stop by Wikipedia do please have a quick look at Scuderia Coloni and correct any errors I've made. Regards, Euryalus (talk) 06:17, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:StatusGPlogo.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:StatusGPlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:35, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Bamboo engineering logo.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Bamboo engineering logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:23, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Bamboo engineering logo.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Bamboo engineering logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 23:30, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Jari Ketomaa for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jari Ketomaa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jari Ketomaa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 21:55, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:ETC Cup logo.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:ETC Cup logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:WTCC logo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:WTCC logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:FordADWRTlogo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:FordADWRTlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Peugeotsportlogo.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Peugeotsportlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Diego Puyo for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diego Puyo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.