Jump to content

User talk:Petercyrus1123

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Petercyrus1123, you are invited to the Teahouse

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Petercyrus1123! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there!

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 00:14, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies if I misconstrued your addition of Miley Cyrus, as "Dracula's Daughter", as vandalism. But could you possibly explain what this has to do with her music, and why such a title is considered to be "an honor"? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:21, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please disregard. I see now that it simply supports the dubious honour of "Teen Queen". It seems that being Dracula's daughter has something to do with dressing up like Justin Bieber. Apparently I need to retire, and write book, or so J-B advises. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:47, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I was just trying to add a new and more correct link to Honorific nicknames in popular music. I thought, since the link I posted was labeled with an "F", it was necessary to replace it with another one. On that link, it says "Teen Queen Miley Cyrus..." Teen Queen is not a dubious title. She's won several contests to acquire that nickname (regard http://www.kiss108.com/pages/teen-queen/index.html) and is often mentioned as Teen Queen or Disney Queen (see http://1079ishot.com/miley-cyrus-engaged-liam-hemsworth/ & http://www.glamourmagazine.co.uk/celebrity/pictures-today/2012/06/14/miley-cyrus-cheyne-thomas-pool-miami) I'm sorry for the confusion I may have caused.
Hi, no worries. It's just the honor of being called a "Teen Queen" that I find a bit dubious - I'm sure it's all fully attested, alas. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:06, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
FYI: Hi Peter, all you had to do in fact was just to correct your "dead link" with its active alternative from the same website (i.e uk.online.com). In other words:
http://uk.eonline.com/news/348455/miley-cyrus-lands-in-bed-with-ashton-kutcher-on-two-and-a-half-men-mdash-see-the-pic?%3Fcmpid=eonline-twitter&dlvrit=48939 should have been replaced by
http://uk.eonline.com/news/348455/miley-cyrus-lands-in-bed-with-ashton-kutcher-on-two-and-a-half-men-mdash-see-the-pic, which doesn't redirect to a "dead" end. Simple as that. Your link was just not properly copied, that's why it was tagged as "dead one". (Do you see the difference between red- and black-bold part now?)
Also, please keep filling all possible parameters as for the cite web-template, not only url-link(s). As well, comment all your edits in articles summaries to keep the others informed. Happy editing (m)anyway. J-B (talk) 15:03, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, thanks for everything. I understand it now.
I wish I did :( Martinevans123 (talk) 15:36, 27 September 2012 (UTC) [reply]