Jump to content

User talk:Phage434

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]
Hello, Phage434, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Guillaume2303 (talk) 21:42, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks for leaving a note about Harold J. Morowitz - myself and others have hopefully proven your point using wikipedia language and the article should no longer be deleted. SmartSE (talk) 20:54, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Phage434 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Well, I don't frankly care whether I get unblocked or not, but you should know that I'm definitely not some sockpuppet. It is a shame that people who try to make Wikipedia better are prevented from doing so. My comments about Morowitz are correct, and I see that you have agreed with them. Frankly, this is the first time I have logged in since then, and I was suprised to see that I was blocked. I wanted to correct some errors on the Xerox Alto page, but I probably won't bother. Too bad. You're losing access to talented people by your random blocks, but I'm aware I'm not the first person to realize this.

Decline reason:

Per response and request below. Kinu t/c 06:24, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This isn't an unblock request; please read the guide to appealing blocks before making another unblock request. Kevin12xd (talk) (contribs) 02:53, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Phage434 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

You don't get it. I don't play this game.

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user (block log | active blocks | autoblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs | abuse log) has had their talk page access revoked because an administrator has identified this user's talkpage edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. If you would like to make further requests, you may contact the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-appeals-en@lists.wikimedia.org. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Kinu t/c 06:24, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]