User talk:Phillip J Henderson

December 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to NORAD Tracks Santa has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: NORAD Tracks Santa was changed by Phillip J Henderson (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.857081 on 2014-12-23T08:48:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:48, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dilma Rousseff. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dilma Rousseff was changed by Phillip J Henderson (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.891326 on 2014-12-23T08:53:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:53, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dilma Rousseff, you may be blocked from editing. Flyer22 (talk) 08:57, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at 70, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: 70 was changed by Phillip J Henderson (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.889824 on 2014-12-23T09:47:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:47, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 68. FrontierMountie (talk) 09:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:14, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Phillip J Henderson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not abuse my editing privileges. I was simply stating the truth. Santa Claus does not exist. It is just your parents. I was just trying to clarify it on the article NORAD tracks santa. Please stop saying I vandalized or abused editing privileges or I'll complain and get your admin priveleges removed. Phillip J Henderson (talk) 03:10, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Kuru (talk) 03:58, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Admins Noticeboard[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. pcfan500 (talk) 12:34, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]