User talk:Prasannarane61993

Welcome!

Hello, Prasannarane61993, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Mumbai, have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can place {{helpme}} on your talk page along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorial
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:41, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Hello, I'm SpacemanSpiff. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —SpacemanSpiff 23:29, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

you have changed ok but it was there when I had seen these pages but what about universal truth and fact that mumbai former name is bombay but you have opposed it  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.48.193.235 (talk) 17:36, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Marathi scripts in the lead

Please do NOT add Marathi text to the lead of articles, as it is against consensus to add them in Indian articles. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC) Marathi is Official language of Maharashtra and so has it is against consensus to remove marathi you are racist.[reply]

1. Be civil. Calling me racist will only get you banned. I'm a Maharashtrian myself. 2. Your statement clearly shows that you have no idea what consensus is, please read WP:CONSENSUS and WP:INDICSCRIPTS. 3. This applies to ALL Indian languages, so adding Marathi text is akin to edit-warring and will only result in you getting warned or banned. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:08, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prasannarane61993, I'm going to warn you here. Please respect consensus, and stop with the name calling. Repeated edit warring to do what you like and what the community has explicitly decided against is likely to just get you blocked. —SpacemanSpiff 13:03, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

see namma metro and delhi metro having kannada and hindi text respectively but there no consensus shows your double standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.48.193.235 (talk) 17:27, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is NO indic text in the lead of either article. Which double standards are you talking about? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:33, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

you have changed it ok but when last time i visited these pages it was there but what about universal truth and fact phrase "Mumbai,formerly known as bombay" that you are opposing it?

Wikipedia is not constant, anything that is incorrect or against policy will be removed. Bombay vs Mumbai is NOT the point of discussion here. However, for the sake of closure, Bombay is still known as Bombay, within India and internationally. There are sources to verify this. I for one, still call it Bombay. This is not a blog for you to push your point of view here. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:48, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion going on at Talk:Mumbai#Mumbai vs Bombay argument. Feel free to join in, and please sign your posts on talk pages with ~~~~. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:54, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Truth is truth.Mumbai is only name of capital of Maharashtra according to Law from 1996.Law are followed and should be followed.

Please sign your posts. Which law are you talking about? There is no law in India that says that a city can only be known by one name and not by its former name. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:29, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Law is there Censorship see http://www.deccanchronicle.com/150213/entertainment-bollywood/article/here%E2%80%99s-list-words-banned-censor-board-india bans use of bombay name by Government Of Maharashtra.

Not a valid point. If you think this is valid, bring it to Talk:Mumbai#Mumbai vs Bombay argument where others can discuss it. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:43, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My point is Extremely Valid as it is a law which itself shows validity of it.

To reiterate, there is no Censor board in India. The Central Board of Film Certification is NOT a law making body, but merely a body that certifies what can be used or said in work of media. So unless you are a lawyer who can prove otherwise, I'd suggest you stop edit warring while logged out and use the talk page for discussions. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:43, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Central board of film certification comes under culture ministry of central and state government and their decision to ban the words listed cannot be violated and if violated punishment will be given.But today situation is that wrong teaching have been given in schools example they say "hindi is our national language" which is a lie proof go to India locked Wikipedia page and also in India constitution doesn't specify any language as National.but then also people spread lies which are accepted.India shame!

They don't ban words. Stop misinterpreting the law as per your own convenience. Go to http://lawmin.nic.in and tell me where the Law says so. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:08, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Read This http://www.deccanchronicle.com/150213/entertainment-bollywood/article/here%E2%80%99s-list-words-banned-censor-board-india article how it is applied If not law,Is it forefully? stop being biased.

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:45, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Mumbai, you may be blocked from editing. —SpacemanSpiff 16:53, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I gave right information by editing to wrong Information filled by AntiMaharashtra People like you.

Discretionary sanctions

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This is in relation to your edits on Mumbai etc. —SpacemanSpiff 17:09, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I know The Current Situation in World is Worse, Today It Does Matters if any body is right or wrong Truth doesnt count, See what happened With palestine people I cannot let it happen with Maharashtrians

August 2015

Your recent editing history at Mumbai shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Abecedare (talk) 19:32, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Konkan in Mumbai article

Please do NOT replace India with Maharashtra, or add Division after Konkan. The section talks about geography. The Konkan region extends into Goa as well. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 20:19, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

POV pushing

Please stop replacing Bombay with Mumbai, espeially when being used in historical articles. VT was called VT when the first train ran. It was not CST till the 1990s. Similarly, please stop removing Bombayite from the demographics section. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 20:29, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will remove all AntiMaharashtra Content put by you.I am guessing how much you earn by doing this ?

Since you don't ever bother explaining your actions and just start accusing me of being anti Maharashtra [and not a paid editor too], all I say is: I am a Maharashtrian editor myself. Your edits are clearly disruptive. Period. Disruptive edits will lead to a ban. There is no anti Mahashtra editing here. It would help if you let go of that mindset and edited with an open mind. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:54, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

whatever edit I have done I have given reference to it i.e I have proved it. I will not edit the way you like it you are not owner of wikipedia that If you dont like it you will block me.

1. Please sign your posts. 2. Stop editing disruptively. 3. I never said I own Wikipedia. I don't. Keep in mind that it applies to you too. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:22, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 12:41, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

whatever edit I have done I have given reference to it i.e I have proved it. I will not edit the way you like it you are not owner of wikipedia that If you dont like it you will block me.

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:13, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Economy of India, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contrary to your accusatory claims on my talk page, your edit on Economy of India did not include a single source. The article is about India. Not Maharashtra alone. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:24, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at India shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Abecedare (talk) 13:33, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding My Edit of Page of India And Economy of India:

Making Misuse Of Your Seniority on Wikipedia:

whatever edit I have done I have given reference to it i.e I have proved it. I will not edit the way you like it you are not owner of wikipedia that If you dont like it you will block me.

The problem is that I added a fact on Maharashtra Contribution to India Gdp proved it by giving a reference as page on Goverment on India site but There are many AntiMaharashtra People who didnt like it What can I do in this?

The only reason people may have to exclude Maharashtra now is because you keep pushing you POV. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 16:35, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Problem Is of IQ Level I think ,Whatever Edits I did Were Truth and Official But Only Educated Person Knows To Be UnBiased and Truthful also Has Much More Knowledge.

In my edit of page of India and Economy of India I had given Facts and Also Given Reference.But then also my edits removed I am warned. Some one saying the page is related to India not Maharashtra. Maharashtra is part of India but also in this Pages Gujarat and Other States Praised but when I put Some fact about Maharashtra this things very difficult for them to Digest. My edits Were also targeted because they were not related to what this Senior people Like and related to their Region of Interest. The problem is that I added a fact on Maharashtra Contribution to India Gdp proved it by giving a reference as page on Goverment on India site but There are many AntiMaharashtra People.

Proof Of How user named Rsrikant is biased see edit history Of page of Ulhasnagar with sindhi language script in lead was Ignored by Rsrikant but he Warned Me of Marathi Script in Lead.This Page was ignored for long time which show How double Standard he is which was finally edited by me and he says he is Maharashtrian. No one is Maharashtrian by name but by action and belief ,I think his mind is Poisioned with AntiMaharashtra agenda.

You will find Many Pages with False Information given by editing but this Biased people keep quit.

I will Not Tolerate this Injustice at all.In my life I have Never Bend in front of Any one and always Supported Truth .

I Know the world today is not good but I have full Confidence that Truth will always win.

when I had edited the Page of India And Economy of India I had Provided Reference:http://statisticstimes.com/economy/gdp-of-indian-states.php

Please stop

Please stop copy pasting the same aggressive text to multiple user pages. This is not a productive means of communication and can be seen as disruptive. Please keep the discussion in one place on the article talk page and try to refrain from discussing other contributors and instead stick the topic at hand. Chillum 17:08, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have the Right to speak And Express my self You cannot take it away from me and also Misuse of Seniority on Wikipedia: Giving Unnecessary Warnings to junior Users is like Taking " Ragging of Junior Students" Which is Strictly Prohibited.

The right to express yourself is secondary. Please follow WP:Talk page guidelines. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 20:28, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rsrikanth05 first stop your biasedness And Double Standards which I have proved today.

Please do not come to Wikipedia looking for freedom of speech. We are a collaborative project to create an encyclopedia and not an experiment in free speech. We are privately ran and offer no such right. I was simply pointing out that copying the same hostile message to several users was disruptive. Chillum 20:29, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you? are you owner of Wikipedia to stop me from using Wikipedia ?

I am one of the many Wikipedia administrators. It is customary to give warning prior to blocking a user for disruptive editing. Chillum 21:27, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Before you accuse me of bias and double standards [which you have not proved anywhere, by the way], please take a lot at YOUR OWN edits, where you have relentlessly been pushing your own Point of view EVERYWHERE. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 21:00, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proof Of How user named Rsrikant05 is biased see edit history Of page of Ulhasnagar where some one had done sindhi language script in lead which was purposely Ignored by Rsrikant05 but he had Warned Me of Marathi Script in Lead before. This Page was ignored for long time by him which show How double Standard he is.This Page was finally corrected by me.

I don't have the time to go thru the 4million plus pages on the English Wikipedia. I haven't seen the Ulhasnagar page before you mentioned it and I have ZERO edits on that page. It is not my duty or responsibility to check EACH and every page for errors. If it was there, I am not responsible for it. Please go thru the policies of Wikipedia before accusing me or anyone here of ANYTHING. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 21:17, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Then block this User Jogi don who did it as you had blocked me in past.

Please be civil and stop giving orders. Nobody has blocked you in the past. I am not an administrator, I cannot block people. Said user has not had any serious violations for a block. The matter is as simple as that. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 21:29, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

I'll try this warning message one more time although you seem to be ignoring most messages posted to your user talk page. Please sign your posts! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:45, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Please stop inserting Maharashtra into every article about Mumbai. It is cluttering it. Also, stop claiming that anyone who reverts you is anti Maharashtra. -- Rsrikanth05 (talk) 12:45, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1st thing If my edit is right you cannot stop me or remove my edit. 2nd thing dont dictate me what I should do and not even when My edits are correct. 3rd thing Wikipedia is not your private property. 4th leave me alone you had last time said you have not time nor its your duty to see all edits error then why you are targeting me and specifically watching me I warn you be in your limit and Mind Your Language.

Great defence. Keep it up. You've done way too many disruptive edits. I'm not following your edits, but there is a 'Related Changes' tag which shows up a lot of your edits on the spectrum. Also, please learn to be civil. Your edit was not right, Wikipedia is not mine, nor is it yours. I'm not dictating anything, and I'm reminding you not to do so as well. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 18:30, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 19:47, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]