User talk:Preime TH

Welcome!

Hello, Preime TH! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 16:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Time to stop

Hi

Constitution of Bulgaria IS NOT Constitution of Greece. In Bulgarian Constitution, since 2023, such PM is officially called caretaker. It is time to stop. Panam2014 (talk) 12:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read reliables sources.

May 2024, Somporn Juangroongruangkit

Hello, I'm Edwardx. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Edwardx (talk) 09:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pornpetch Wichitcholchai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caretaker. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgaria

Hi

Could you explain him that he should stop his changes without sources? Removing sourced content is a vandalism. Panam2014 (talk) 00:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You could try talking to this administrator. User:ToBeFree Preime TH (talk) 04:33, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Horus (talk) 07:14, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Horus (talk) 07:22, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Horus (talk) 07:57, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting

Hello. Please could you stop reverting; if you make an edit and it is reverted, you should try and gain consensus for your change on the talk page, in line with WP:BRD. Thanks, Number 5 7 22:31, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I think the format of showing the baby political parties is better because in some periods Thailand was in the period of the 2 main party system, namely in the years 1957, 1969 and 2005-2011. Preime TH (talk) 22:34, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you mean by "baby" political parties, but in most elections a large number of parties won seats.

The original rationale for changing the infobox to include all the parties was the fact that there was no clear rationale for including or excluding parties (at the time, an editor was regularly adding/removing parties from Thai infoboxes without clear reasoning), particularly given the highly volatile nature of Thai politics. Therefore (IMO) it is easier to just include all of them. What we don't want to end up with is a situation like Indian elections where there is constant edit warring over which parties to include. Cheers, Number 5 7 22:37, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's why I think it's more reasonable to display data only for the main parties, like the 2019 election. I see that 1 of the 11 political parties is just a political party that is considered to be rounded up from the AMS election system, which votes only for MPs on a constituency basis. Party lists are scored on a district-wise basis. Preime TH (talk) 22:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's the whole issue though – the definition of "main parties" is subjective and doesn't create consistency. For example, in 1975 Thai general election, you kept the top six parties – why is a party with 16 seats (Social Nationalist) worthy of inclusion but a party with 15 seats (Socialist Party) not?

As far as I can see, there not a compelling argument and zero benefit in excluding some parties that won seats. Number 5 7 22:47, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Social Nationalist Party It is a political party that joins the government and has roles such as the leader of this party holding the positions of Speaker of the House of Representatives and President of the National Assembly. As for the Socialist Party, although it won seats in parliament, it did not play much of a role. Preime TH (talk) 22:53, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And this illustrates what I mean about a lack of consistency – you excluded several parties that are government coalition members from the new 2023 infobox. And in the 2019 infobox you included one party than won ten seats but not the other. Doing it like this is a mess and will inevitably lead to endless disputes about which parties are sufficiently "main".

What problem does including all the parties actually create? Number 5 7 23:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cabinet of Thailand article

Dear @Preime TH, I see that you recently did many edits in the Cabinet of Thailand article. Thank you for keeping the information up to date.

However, you did not add any new sources. Particularly, I disagree with changing the "Took Office" date of all cabinet members to September 3. First, according to the source provided, the cabinet was approved on September 4. You may need to add another source that confirms the cabinet took office on September 3. Second, many cabinet members remained in their previous offices. Now it appears they just took office, although some have been active in the same position for many more months or even a year. For example, the Anutin Charnvirakul article states that Mr. Anutin assumed office as Minister of Interior on September 1, 2023 and as deputy prime minister in 2019. This now contradicts the information shown in the table. Therefore, I would suggest rectifying the dates to resolve these contradictions. XulF (talk) 16:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@XulF Hello as well, although the royal command was published on 4 September 2024 the appointment was made on 3 September 2024. Preime TH (talk) 22:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Announced on 3 September B.E. 2567, being the 9th year of the present Reign. Preime TH (talk) 22:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but there is no source given for it in the article. Also, the other problem remains: Many ministers remained in office, they did not just start on September 3rd. XulF (talk) 08:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:SMALL

Hi Preime TH. Per MOS:SMALL, smaller font sizes should not be used in infoboxes. Therefore, I've reverted your use of {{small| at Anand Panyarachun. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 12:52, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited King of Malaysia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page His Majesty.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to King of Malaysia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 01:19, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How can you not be creative? I edited it to be true. Yang di Petuan Agong This is the official position title that must come before the informal title according to principle. It may cause people to misunderstand. And another thing, Yang di Petuan Agong does not mean constitutional monarchy, but means Supreme Head of the Federation Preime TH (talk) 02:23, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is an encyclpedia, we're not supposed to be "creative". And none of that explains removing sourced content or adding non-existent files. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 03:16, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]