User talk:Prince elvis mozart

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Pope Innocent VI, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so on Wikipedia:Sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Yopie (talk) 15:03, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Yopie (talk) 17:09, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article List of rulers of Auvergne, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Yopie (talk) 18:29, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Randon II

The article Randon II has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, no references.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Edison (talk) 02:57, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Randon II

I have nominated Randon II, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randon II. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Edison (talk) 04:23, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:21, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

French Wikipedia

If French is your first language, you may want to contribute to the French Wikipedia at http://fr.wikipedia.org/ If you visit http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randon_II , you will see that there is no article there yet about Randon II. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:30, 25 January 2010 (UTC) French is my first languages but eveyone read history in english.i try to have a good english . thanks a lot .sincerely[reply]

Proposed deletion of Famille aubert de bulbon d'apchon

The article Famille aubert de bulbon d'apchon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

claims of nobility but no evidence of notability / WP is not for genealogies also utterly slovenly formatting

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 06:56, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article in the French Wikipedia which mentions Randon II, at [1], has him becoming a governor after you claim he died in your article about him here, as was pointed out in the AFD. Verifiability is a basic requirement in the English Wikipedia. Edison (talk) 01:57, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your series of edits

Before running around creating a series of poorly referenced articles in fractured English about genealogical topics, how about creating articles in the French Wikipedia about those topics, where the editors can readily evaluate the quality of the references and the notability of the subjects? Some of your subjects here are red-linked in the French Wikipedia, and some of your information is in conflict with the French articles. Thanks. Edison (talk) 01:52, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]