Jump to content

User talk:Prokopenya Viktor/Archive4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Brighton Yacht Club Marina

A tag has been placed on Brighton Yacht Club Marina, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Brighton Yacht Club Marina and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. • Gene93k (talk) 12:54, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

The Brighton Yacht Club Marina page is also marked as as a copyright infringement of http://www.rbyc.yachting.org.au/default.asp?Page=9271&MenuID=Clubhouse/c10030/2913/, http://www.rbyc.yachting.org.au/default.asp?Page=2970&MenuID=Clubhouse/c10030/2913/, http://www.rbyc.yachting.org.au/default.asp?Page=3195&MenuID=Membership/c10031/2940/, http://www.rbyc.yachting.org.au/default.asp?Page=3082&MenuID=Clubhouse/c10030/2913/ and http://www.rbyc.yachting.org.au/default.asp?Page=2971&MenuID=Membership/c10031/2940/. • Gene93k (talk) 12:54, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Rainbow Harbor

A tag has been placed on Rainbow Harbor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mayalld (talk) 13:49, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Downtown Shoreline Marina

A tag has been placed on Downtown Shoreline Marina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mayalld (talk) 13:50, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Alamitos Bay Marina

A tag has been placed on Alamitos Bay Marina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mayalld (talk) 13:51, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Infobox port

Template:Infobox port has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Mayalld (talk) 14:09, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2008

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. As should now be abundantly clear, a vast amount of effort is being expended in deleting articles that you are creating. Wikipedia is not a directory, and you must cease your attempts to make it into one with articles about every jetty capable of berthing a boat. Please refer to the Notability Guidelines for more information. Mayalld (talk) 14:36, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Lodge of Four Seasons Marina

I have nominated Lodge of Four Seasons Marina, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lodge of Four Seasons Marina. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mayalld (talk) 14:37, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Breakwater Marina

I have nominated Breakwater Marina, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breakwater Marina. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mayalld (talk) 15:39, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Bremerton Marina

I have nominated Bremerton Marina, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bremerton Marina (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TravellingCari 17:09, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems: Squalicum Harbor Marina

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Squalicum Harbor Marina, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.portofbellingham.com/squalicum_harbor_home_page.php,http://www.parks.wa.gov/moorage/pumpout/locations/pumpoutdetail.asp?pumpNo=4,http://www.marinasdirectory.org/unitedstates/washington/bellingham/1070.asp. As a copyright violation, Squalicum Harbor Marina appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Squalicum Harbor Marina has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems: Twin Bridges Marina

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Twin Bridges Marina, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.twinbridgesmarina.com/faq.htm and http://www.parks.wa.gov/moorage/pumpout/locations/pumpoutdetail.asp?pumpNo=210. As a copyright violation, Twin Bridges Marina appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Twin Bridges Marina has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. • Gene93k (talk) 19:34, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Zittel's Marina

I have nominated Zittel's Marina, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zittel's Marina. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mayalld (talk) 20:00, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Skyline Marina

I have nominated Skyline Marina, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skyline Marina. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mayalld (talk) 06:20, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Hall of Fame Marina

I have nominated Hall of Fame Marina, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hall of Fame Marina. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mayalld (talk) 06:22, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Port Ludlow Marina

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Port Ludlow Marina. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 10:12, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Port Ludlow Marina, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.portludlowchamber.org/22.html and http://port-ludlow.info/plh/recreation/boating/marina.html. As a copyright violation, Port Ludlow Marina appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Port Ludlow Marina has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. • Gene93k (talk) 10:12, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Puerto Del Rey Marina

A tag has been placed on Puerto Del Rey Marina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mayalld (talk) 10:45, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Queencliff Marina

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Queencliff Marina, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.queenscliffharbour.com.au/harbour.html and http://www.queenscliffharbour.com.au/PDF/QH_Newsletter_July.pdf. As a copyright violation, Queencliff Marina appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Queencliff Marina has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. • Gene93k (talk) 22:34, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Sandringham Yacht Club Marina

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Sandringham Yacht Club Marina, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.syc.com.au/facilities. As a copyright violation, Sandringham Yacht Club Marina appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Sandringham Yacht Club Marina has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. • Gene93k (talk) 23:00, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent and repeated additions of copyright violating material after four warnings in the past week to stop. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. — Athaenara ✉ 23:05, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

.

Closing my project devoted to marinas

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Prokopenya Viktor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the reason in my message below

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for your block, i.e., copyright violations. —  Sandstein  20:58, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I would like to thank everybody, who helped me with this project. Your additions, criticism and remarks were very useful. I studied all the information that you referenced to in your messages and tags. I agree that my decision about the development of this topic wasn’t well thought-out. The general idea of all these articles doesn’t correspond to the wiki-policy. That is why I finished my work at the topic «ports and marinas» and after my unblocking I will add deletion tag ({db-author}) to the nominated articles.

I think it’s possible to rewrite some of the articles, but they will be published again if and only if they are correspond to the wiki-policy. Prokopenya Viktor (talk) 17:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Additional comments

Blockquote

Hi Athaenara. At User talk:Prokopenya Viktor there is a request for unblock, and what seems to be an apology. (He says he will put db-author on all this articles). You can decide if reform has occurred! EdJohnston (talk) 20:30, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

I would feel more comfortable if his similar article contributions on the Russian site were also considered: link. He may be creating legitimate articles based on English Wikipedia counterparts, but if there are the same copyvio and notability issues, they should be dealt with now, and there are a number of questionable links being added (fire-arms.ru, gunsite.narod.ru and slot-machines.waffe.ru are just a few). User:Alex717 has also adding similarly written and edited articles at the same pace. Flowanda | Talk 21:23, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

(Two posts above forwarded from my user talk page.) — Athaenara ✉ 22:02, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Blaine Harbor Marina

I have nominated Blaine Harbor Marina, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blaine Harbor Marina. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mayalld (talk) 06:25, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Chinook Landing Marina

I have nominated Chinook Landing Marina, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinook Landing Marina. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mayalld (talk) 06:27, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of John Wayne Marina

I have nominated John Wayne Marina, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Wayne Marina. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mayalld (talk) 06:30, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Elliot Bay Marina

I have nominated Elliot Bay Marina, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elliot Bay Marina. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mayalld (talk) 06:32, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Cap Sante Marina

I have nominated Cap Sante Marina, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cap Sante Marina. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mayalld (talk) 14:59, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sandringham Yacht Club Marina

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sandringham Yacht Club Marina, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Flowanda | Talk 10:32, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shilshole Bay Marina

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Shilshole Bay Marina, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mayalld (talk) 10:41, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Oak Harbor Marina

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Oak Harbor Marina, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mayalld (talk) 15:15, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Port of Astoria Marina

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Port of Astoria Marina, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mayalld (talk) 15:15, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Prokopenya_Viktor/Archive4&oldid=1068590899"