User talk:Prospermeer98

September 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Draft:Fantastic Four (2024 film), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. I am giving you this warning as you have been reverted on your edits at the article three times, and any further edits of this nature will violate the WP:3RR, which could result in administrative discipline. I've responded to your concerns on the draft's talk page. Trailblazer101 (talk) 13:30, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi there Trailblazier .... I am very honored that you have promptly responded to the discussion. You may see that the username is new however, I have been a Wikipedia contributer for about a year now (my orginal username account is "blocked")and now very well the guidelines of the platform. I have never broken nor maken any form illegal or invalid misconduct in my editing. Iam very proud to state that there is a valid reason why I added the "Cast " option and that the casting will be announced this coming weekend with valid scoopers including myself with no assumptions/ predictions repoting on this. Thus iam very aware that this may be in contravention of the platform but that is not a case. Kindly note that as a very respected user, I felt quite offended by your demeaning attitude to your response. This is a free and democratic platform and should I have offended you , regettable my apologies. Thank you in advance nd hope to hear you soon Prospermeer98 (talk) 18:55, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

I gave you the warning as a courtesy to bring it to your attention as your repeated reverts indicated otherwise in your policy awareness. Policies hold more weight than guidelines on here, and must be upheld, with your three reverts violating the linked policy in the warning. On the guideline side of things, we do not include characters in a project if they are not confirmed by reliable sources. One can easily expect and assume the Fantastic Four members from the comics will be in a film based on the Fantastic Four comics, but none of the official and reliable sources deemed acceptable by the Wikipedia community and the MCU taskforce (see WP:MCURS). The "valid scoopers" you discuss have not been provided in your edits for such announcements that are expected, but have not been confirmed as Marvel does not reveal what their announcements are until they happen. You yourself cannot be a source for information, especially a valid one, and is in fact making an assumption as you did not provide any reliable sources confirming your edits. I cannot take your word on what you may or may not have done in the past on here, or the nature of this platform. I am in no way offended by your actions, I am simply upholding the policies and guidelines of the Wikipedia community. Going forward, I caution you to be more informed on the exact policies and guidelines of Wikipedia, as even a years experience can't teach you everything there is. You can familiarize yourself with the policies and guidelines in the links provided in the warning and at WP:MCU for the MCU content for what is acceptable behavior and contributions. Adding characters to a cast section without confirmation and reliable sourcing is bad form, especially when including such parameters as "TBA" for empty actor spaces. There is also the WP:Teahouse where you can receive advice and help with any questions that may arise. Trailblazer101 (talk) 21:07, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Trailblazer101 I hearby would like to appreciate your demeaning lecturing attitude that you have displayed with your responses. I have never violated any of the abovementioned policies/guidelines of the platform . This is not me trying to cause harmful or any form of arising offensive argument per se regardless of our contrasting views, it seems like for some reason your "warning" is of the view that I have committed a criminal offence which I have NEVER committed. Nevertheless, Iam deeply disappointed that this discussion has now become so serious to the point that you have assumed me to be a criminal offender or one of the other "users in this platform.

Please let us just gave a civilized manner of a discussion and be respectiful to one another. Thank you in advance Prospermeer98 (talk) 04:58, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

With all due respect, I am being as understanding and calm with this. I am in no way saying you committed a crime, just simply warning you not to violate the three-revert rule in continuing your edits, which I already explained to you several times were not formatted correctly and were unsourced, which is bad form. I am sorry to hear you feel this way, but I am not accusing you of such actions as you believe. This was a simple caution as your edits did not convey a proper understanding of guidelines, formatting, and reliable sources. That is all. Trailblazer101 (talk) 12:20, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Miss Universe Colombia. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:39, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Prospermeer98

Your edits are wrong. Please change. The only head of Miss World is Julia Morley.

The news of a new owner is #fakenews. Please remove this from the Miss World wiki page.

Kelso.1979 (talk) 14:40, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to List of Miss Universe countries has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. ☆ Bri (talk) 13:30, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mister Supranational 2024

Hello Prospermeer98,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mister Supranational 2024 for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Mister Supranational 2024 to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 10:39, 16 July 2023 (UTC)