User talk:Proti Mou Fora~

July 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Arandu, Pakistan has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Arandu, Pakistan was changed by Proti Mou Fora~ (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885738 on 2015-07-15T14:14:24+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:14, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chitral. Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Chitral was changed by Proti Mou Fora~ (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.872307 on 2015-07-15T15:28:01+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:28, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Climate of Chitral[edit]

A tag has been placed on Climate of Chitral requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

A10. Just created content fork of a section of Chitral; see page history of that article.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Thomas.W ^talk 15:52, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015, continued[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Chitral, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 15:56, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015[edit]

Your recent editing history at Chitral shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Favonian (talk) 15:59, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]