User talk:ProudCitizen

Welcome!

Hello, ProudCitizen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 02:48, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm Plandu. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Fraser Anning— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Plandu (talk) 17:19, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikipedia. stop defending bigots. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.31.178.2 (talk) 18:52, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I understand where you're coming from on this, believe me, but that's an inherently subjective term. Calling him that falls under our proscription on no original research. Explaining the stuff he's done, that's fine. Saying what his actions make him - you'd have to quote someone. If you can get a quote to that effect from a media source, that'll be good. DS (talk) 21:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019[edit]

Your edits on List of The Boys characters has been reverted. Twice. As per WP:BRD, after your Bold edit is Reverted, you take yourself to the article talk page to Discuss the changes you would like to see. That is how consensus is built, which in turn leads to a stable article. Please do not edit-war, as that will always end poorly. See you on the talk page. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 19:50, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have now reverted three times. If it occurs again, I will ask that you be blocked. I have explained to you clearly the BRD process. I urge you, please don't make me file a complaint. Use the discussion page, instead of edit-warring.

Please consider this your last warning. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 20:46, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Jack Sebastian (talk) 21:00, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 21:19, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This block is also for your personal attacks and threat to sock. 331dot (talk) 21:20, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

331dot (talk) 21:57, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done. 331dot (talk) 21:58, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]