User talk:Ps07swt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Hello, Ps07swt! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Button sig.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 14:55, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Point of view[edit]

Please beware of non-neutral edits as you have made here and here. Wikipedia is a place to relate verifiable facts, not opinions. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:57, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Use of non-peer reviewed research as references[edit]

Many of the references that you have recently added appear to be dissertations of a University in Texas. I cannot see any evidence that these dissertations have been peer-reviewed and published in an established reputable journal. Please see WP:NOT#OR. Please can you revert these additions or provide evidence of their notability and consistency with WP policy. Thanks.  Velela  Velela Talk   15:41, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Dissertations and other work by students is peer often peer reviewed. It is reviewed by the faculty that signed off on the material. It is not blind peer review which is the standard of quality academic journal articles. Dissertation and master's theses are often open access and thus easy for Wikipedia users to get to. They contain easy to access additional information on the topic, which is often more accessible to the general public.

Nomination of CenTex ASPA for deletion[edit]

The article CenTex ASPA is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CenTex ASPA until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Zachlipton (talk) 23:47, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

June 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Working hypothesis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [http://www.archive.org/stream/centurydictionar11whituoft#page/616/mode/1up v. 11, p. 616] (via ''Internet Archive''] of the ''Century Dictionary and Cyclopedia'', 1911. {{quote|'''hypothesis''' [...]—'''Working
  • method, an explanatory hypothesis is judged and selected<ref>Peirce, C. S., Carnegie Application (L75, 1902, ''[[Charles Sanders Peirce bibliography#NEM|New Elements of Mathematics]]'' v. 4, pp. 37–

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:59, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Operationalization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Artifact (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Conceptual framework, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inductive (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)