User talk:PublicSquare

Welcome!

Hello PublicSquare, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:55, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Cats

You've been adding Category:Paleoconservative publications to article that don't mention paleoconservatism, or aren't publications. Please make sure that there are sources for any categories you add. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 01:37, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppet

I am not a sockpuppet of Sarsaparilla.

I don't believe you. User:Sarsaparilla and perhaps User:Karmaisking as well. Not to mention User:Aldrich Hanssen. Why don't you just confess to an admin; promise to stay away for a few months and keep your promise; come back and beg forgiveness and start again with a variation on your real name which you do use on libertarianwiki.

And those sidebars do not rise to the level of controversial - they are fringe/marginal/not worthy of category. Paleolibertarian is a nomiker whose time has come and gone. And Agorism - look at the refs. Sam Konkin and three non-linked refs that don't even quote what sources say so we know if they are real or not are not much of a ref to get a whole category. CarolMooreDC (talk) 14:31, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Okay, I deleted these templates. I didn't know that it's the wikipedian policy unpopular topics should not be included. PublicSquare (talk) 16:14, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Suspected Sockpuppet

moved from my talk page Hello, I created two templates under my userpage, under the name location User:PublicSquare/. These pages are not included the main wikispace. I explicitly told in that I will not use these templates in any wikipedia articles unless a majority approved my template. So my actions does not pose any threat to the majority's viewing pleasure.

You have recently labeled me as an alleged sockpuppet of another. I became offended. Do I have the right to remove that label? I think I have the right because just because some random person added the label, it does not really mean that I am a sockpuppet. I don't know why I cannot remove the labels added by Carol Moore while I can remove the labels done by others. PublicSquare (talk) 16:04, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Pages that exist with no purpose but advancing personal POV need to be deleted. Thanks for doing that.

See WP:sockpuppet for policies. If you are not the sockpuppet in question, just coincidentally were created when he was busy creating a bunch of sock puppets; have excellent skills for a "newbie" including in creating templates on libertarianism, as has his sockpuppets; and have edited a number of same pages his various sockpuppets have... well, thus the problem sockpuppets create for innocent people. But the coincidences, building on many past similar coincidences by other identified sockpuppets(in general and by this particular individual who I suspect you are) are too much. CarolMooreDC (talk) 16:16, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Right-libertarianism_sidebar

Template:Right-libertarianism_sidebar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. John Nevard (talk) 03:57, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Agorism sidebar

Template:Agorism sidebar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Terraxos (talk) 01:11, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Agorism

Template:Agorism has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Terraxos (talk) 01:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Your requests for review and WP:Canvass

Your contributions page shows you asked 16 people to review the agorism issues above. That may go way beyond what is recommended in WP:Canvass and "compromise the consensus building process and may be considered disruptive." FYI !!!

The two Agorism templates

In case they are useful in the future or so. I am substing the two templates in your talk page. -- Magioladitis (talk) 21:23, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of New Libertarian Manifesto for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Libertarian Manifesto is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Libertarian Manifesto until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Grnrchst (talk) 18:11, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Category:Paleolibertarianism has been nominated for deletion

Category:Paleolibertarianism has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:16, 11 February 2024 (UTC)