User talk:Purgehiker
Purgehiker, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Purgehiker! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 14 September 2020 (UTC) |
WikiProject Disambiguation
[edit]Hi, please don't create talk pages if all they contain is Template:WikiProject Disambiguation. You can see the template's documentation for the reasons why. There's no need to worry about any pages you've created so far. – Uanfala (talk) 18:32, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- I was coming to say the same... and to add that a page like Normelli isn't actually a disambiguation page, it's a surname page, so is of interest to WikiProject Anthroponymy but not WP Dab. PamD 22:20, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Eliza Violet Gist Blair
[edit]
Hello, Purgehiker. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eliza Violet Gist Blair".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:55, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
Ways to improve Thea Engelbertink
[edit]Hello, Purgehiker,
Thank you for creating Thea Engelbertink.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
The reference states she won 2 silver and 2 bronze and the article states gold in shot put and javelin could you please check
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
JW 1961 Talk 21:15, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Linda Bock moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Linda Bock, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 13:52, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
July 2023
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.