User talk:Queen Of Spades

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --digital_me(TalkContribs) 20:42, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OWN[edit]

Please do not sign the mainspace pages, signatures are reserved for talk pages. Thanks, DVD+ R/W 20:44, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please do not sign articles. DVD+ R/W 20:45, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You do not own these articles, and if you continue to claim so on their pages, you will be blocked from editing. Please read our policy on this matter, WP:OWN. DVD+ R/W 20:52, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, this is your last warning, if you continue to do this you will be blocked. DVD+ R/W 20:59, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been warned many times, yet you continue to add statements of ownership to articles. PLEASE STOP. You will be blocked if you continue to violate Wikipedia's official policy on ownership. —Celithemis 01:31, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, after warning you about signing articles and claiming outright ownership of them in the articlespace, I've blocked you for 24 hours. Please review the policy page recommended to you and do not do this again in the future. Thanks, DVD+ R/W 01:43, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during September 25 2006 (UTC) to Architectural theory[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to blank pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ryūlóng 01:49, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. alphaChimp(talk) 01:53, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove legitimate warnings from your talk page or replace them with inappropriate content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted legitimate comments. If you continue to remove or vandalize legitimate warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 01:45, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:40oz. Slushie.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:40oz. Slushie.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:04, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Adding ratings to album pages[edit]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Tuxicity. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —Celithemis 07:33, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive.
Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 21:08, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 weeks for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. DVD+ R/W 21:10, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing your warnings and block notices with this [1] is not going to get you unblocked. Please refrain from doing so or you may be blocked permanently. -- Gogo Dodo 06:20, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to User:Nishkid64[edit]

Your recent edit to User:Nishkid64 (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 23:39, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've indefinitely blocked you for vandalism and trolling. You've had several chances to reform. Please reconsider your behavior. Luna Santin 23:41, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:40oz. Slushie2.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:40oz. Slushie2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —Nv8200p talk 04:19, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CFD[edit]

Because of your edit history, I thought you might be interested in contributing to this deletion discussion. Thanks. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 03:41, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Tcard Bill.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Tcard Bill.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:04, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Tcard Buttons.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Tcard Buttons.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:04, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Bob Martin.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]