User talk:RFNirmala

Welcome!

Hi RFNirmala! I would like to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi RFNirmala! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

-- 10:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, RFNirmala. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by AddWittyNameHere 04:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Robert Gayre

That doesn't need a short description. "Editors should keep in mind that short descriptions are meant to distinguish an article from similarly named articles in search results, and not to define the subject" and "All articles should have a short description (and therefore should belong to Category:Articles with short description), but some article titles are sufficiently detailed that an additional short description would not be helpful, e.g., Alpine skiing at the 1960 Winter Olympics – Men's downhill.

In those cases, should be used to add the article to Category:Articles with short description. Occasionally, a default value of "none" may already be transcluded, for example in some Wikipedia list articles; that default should not normally need to be edited, but it can be overridden for a specific page by addingIn those cases, {{Short description|none}} should be used to add the article to Category:Articles with short description. Occasionally, a default value of "none" may already be transcluded, for example in some Wikipedia list articles; that default should not normally need to be edited, but it can be overridden for a specific page by adding

at the at the top of the page." Hm, that last {{Short description|Overriding description} didn't show, so I removed a }.

He's also better known for the racist Mankind Quarterly and the falsification of his pedigree. Doug Weller talk 15:30, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller

Does it mean I should intentionally leave Robert Gayre's short description blank? Even if short descriptions aren't supposed to define, they can at least help differeniate itself from other articles (such as similarly spelled articles like Robert Garrels)

I might have edited it from the Wikipedia mobile app for adding short descriptions.

I did not consider his work in my edit, so thanks for calling that out.

RFNirmala (talk) 00:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about that. I think short description none is best. Do you want to add that or should I? Doug Weller talk 07:06, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Intentionally removed the short description. You can add a note in the talk page or an invisible comment. RFNirmala (talk) 07:26, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ilona Maher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC News. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

François-Louis Auvity

Dear RFNirmala, I'm much obliged to you for rewording and improving my text! Thank you very much for your help! Mémoiredumaquis (talk) 10:36, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mémoiredumaquis

Thanks for the message! I wanted to know what does the "appointed titular bishop in partibus" phrase mean. I tried searching and partibus (infidelium) means “in the regions of the infidels”, but I'm not sure how to put it in the article. We can add some italics or a wikilink, but let's hope another editor can improve our article more.

Again, you're welcome!

RFNirmala (talk) 11:10, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"In-partibus" bishoprics were antique Catholic cities which were lost at the time of the crusades. During the Middle Ages, an "in-partibus" title meant that the bishop in question was in charge of a bishopric which was yet to be re-conquered. In practice, it soon became a means for the Pope to ensure his protégés an honorary prelacy and a suitable prebend. Those "in-partibus" bishoprics were distributed after the Second World War to dismissed Nazis prelates to whom the Pope wanted to leave an episcopal title and a large prebend. I don't think there's a wikilink for that, but I'll look it up, thanks! :) Mémoiredumaquis (talk) 15:32, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]