User talk:Radmila91

December 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Allergy, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Allergy was changed by Radmila91 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.928998 on 2011-12-11T16:29:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:30, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Giving advice

Encyclopedias do not give advice. They might list advice that is commonly given in particular situations, but only when supported with a strong (secondary) source. Please also have a look at WP:YOU—encyclopedias do not address their readers in the second person. JFW | T@lk 16:50, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I had to revert all of your changes here as you broke the majority of the references on the page with whatever you did. Please make sure that you don't do unintentional damage when adding content. --GraemeL ^(talk) 13:36, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And even if you're more careful about formatting, please don't add that content again. Adding the same or similar content repeatedly without consensus is considered edit warring, which is prohibited. Your additions have been reverted by several editors, both at your IP and as a registered user, so it should be pretty clear to you by now that you're editing against consensus. I'll repeat what I told you on your IP talk page:

Please read these two Wikipedia policies carefully: WP:NOR and WP:ISNOT. If you're new to Wikipedia, this is another good page to read.

If you still don't understand why your edits are problematic, please leave a note at the help desk, and someone will be glad to explain it to you. If you'd like to discuss the specifics of the content in question, the place for that is the article's talk page. Thanks! Rivertorch (talk) 20:10, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Allergy, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Allergy was changed by Radmila91 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.898733 on 2011-12-20T10:23:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:23, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Allergy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 10:35, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Allergy

Please read the messages above and avoid adding personal advice/analysis to wikipedia articles. So far you seem to ignore those notes. Please stop and reconsider. Materialscientist (talk) 10:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]