User talk:Randomoss

Your recent edit to Socom 4 (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 21:32, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help with upload image

I'm listening and I'll try to help. Give me more info. Cynrin 02:23, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I restored a previous image on SOCOM 4: U.S. Navy SEALs, let me know if this is acceptable, or you still need my help. Cynrin 02:31, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I put your image there. Let me know if there is a problem. Cynrin 02:55, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with SOCOM 4: U.S. Navy SEALs. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Tubezone 21:20, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... probably not a good idea to paste it onto your userpage either. You might want to change it something else. Before people start jumping up and down (I'm not meaning to cause a fuss about it, just warning you others might....). Hope this message helps. Mathmo ^Talk 03:36, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What image?

Hey, what's your problem? Conscious 21:39, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image upload

I went to the address you left on my talk page and in the article, but nothing came up. The address is not valid. I'm going to restore the old picture until this is resolved. If you get a valid link, let me know. Also, comments like "help me upload this picture" belong on the talk page of the article or imbedded in the article so that is visable only to people who click on "edit this page". Cynrin 19:04, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SOCOM 4: U.S. Navy SEALs

A tag has been placed on SOCOM 4: U.S. Navy SEALs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article is a repost of either already posted material, or of material that was previously deleted in a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how SOCOM 4: U.S. Navy SEALs is different from all other articles, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:SOCOM 4: U.S. Navy SEALs saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we ask you to follow these instructions. Pan Dan 13:45, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create redirects from the mainspace to userspace, as you did by redirecting SOCOM 4 to your userpage. Thanks, Pan Dan 16:37, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SOCOM 4: U.S. Navy SEALs (again)

You really do need to at the very least show that it has been anounced it is in production, I haven't seen a shred of evidence for that so far. Otherwise the page is likely to be salted. And perhaps, you might even find yourself with a block. Slow down, and find sources. Feel free to posts to my talk page if you need help here. Mathmo ^Talk 07:29, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gaming Forum Wars

A tag has been placed on Gaming Forum Wars, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Gaming Forum Wars. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mhking 03:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please DO NOT remove content on Wikipedia, as you did to Semen. It is considered vandalism which, under Wikipedia guidelines, can lead to blocks being applied. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Planetary Chaos Talk to me 16:40, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Gamingfourmwar.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Gamingfourmwar.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:07, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I Still Love H.E.R.

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article I Still Love H.E.R., suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 18:24, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lost My Gun

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Lost My Gun. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 06:08, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]