User talk:Rayver calilung

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2022[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm WayKurat. I noticed that you made a comment on the page DWBL-FM that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -WayKurat (talk) 06:59, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to DYLS-FM has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. -WayKurat (talk) 06:59, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Under estimate WayKurat Superastig Rayver calilung (talk) 11:18, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FMR Lucena moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, FMR Lucena, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 06:31, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FMR Pampanga moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, FMR Pampanga, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 06:32, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse (February 1)[edit]

Teahouse logo
Hello, Rayver calilung! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:41, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FMR Lucena (February 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Kavyansh.Singh were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:43, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FMR Pampanga moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, FMR Pampanga, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 06:57, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FMR Lucena moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, FMR Lucena, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 06:57, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moving Pages?[edit]

Please don't move pages to mainspace before they are fully developed. And also don't add false tags that the article was created through the AFC process. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 07:00, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is really misleading. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 07:00, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: FMR Pampanga (February 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gpkp was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Gpkp [utc] 07:02, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Copyright issues"[edit]

You have been moving multiple pages with the reason of "Due to copyright issues". I don't see how they are copyright issues. Can you please explain? Sdrqaz (talk) 23:39, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rayver calilung,
Several editors are having problems with your editing habits. It would be wise to discuss these issues before they become bigger problems and result in a loss of editing privileges. Liz Read! Talk! 01:38, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Enable Rayver calilung (talk) 01:03, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page HueMan1 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review Liz Read! Talk! 05:53, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Liz Read! Talk! 05:55, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Rayver calilung,
Moving around another editor's User pages is unacceptable. You have one more chance but, after this block is over, if you do this again, you will be blocked indefinitely. Liz Read! Talk! 05:59, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like retaliatory disruption 'cause pages they created were draftified and because of their copyvio's? Whatever the reason, what Liz said. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:38, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to News Patrol. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. VictorTorres2002 (talk) 05:49, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, you may be blocked from editing. VictorTorres2002 (talk) 11:37, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: This user did not stop moving articles to draftspace after his block expired. Might as well block this user permanently since he won't listen. -WayKurat (talk) 11:41, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:02, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Endorse indefinite block. You went over-the-top after receiving multiple warnings about page moves and apparently these moves were for no reason other than disruption. Then you wasted other editors' time cleaning up after your mess. If I had been awake when this had occurred, I would have blocked you myself. Liz Read! Talk!
@Malcolmxl5 pls unblock Rayver calilung (talk) 00:52, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You should make an unblock request using {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Be sure to read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 15:09, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:27, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:DXLA[edit]

Information icon Hello, Rayver calilung. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:DXLA, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect FMR Pampanga has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 7 § FMR Pampanga until a consensus is reached. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 03:55, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect FMR Albay has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 7 § FMR Albay until a consensus is reached. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 03:56, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect FMR Infanta has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 7 § FMR Infanta until a consensus is reached. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 03:57, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect FMR Lucena has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 7 § FMR Lucena until a consensus is reached. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 03:58, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect FMR Batangas has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 7 § FMR Batangas until a consensus is reached. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 03:59, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect FMR Aurora has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 7 § FMR Aurora until a consensus is reached. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 03:59, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]