User talk:Rcktechiees

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rcktechiees (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

userin@67 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

i am new to wikipedia and i don't know the norms to create username so i used my company name same as username. now i understood the norms for creating user name. so i requested new user name . please unblock my account

Decline reason:

Before we go any further, I want you to answer the questions below, which so far you have deleted twice. PhilKnight (talk) 18:39, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here are a few key questions:

Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
Do you understand conflict of interest?
Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the 3 important principles above. PhilKnight (talk) 18:39, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Response for your questions to unblock my account

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Rcktechiees (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

userin@67 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Yes, I understood that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory.

Yes, I understood conflict of interest.

Yes, I understood that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, Then I also understood Subject Notable policy.

Accept reason:

Allowing username change to requested username. Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. PhilKnight (talk) 11:13, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Rcktechiees/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:59, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Rcktechiees, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:59, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Rcktechiees - violation of unblock conditions. Thank you. MER-C 08:45, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:55, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]