User talk:Respectthevette

Problems with upload of File:Thomas Falsetta.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Thomas Falsetta.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Thomas Falsetta worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 02:29, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Wii superfan banner.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Wii superfan banner.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:24, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Thomas Falsetta.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Thomas Falsetta.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 10:27, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thomas Falsetta

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Thomas Falsetta, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

I cannot find any reliable secondary sources that can provide any independent coverage of this Internet personality in which notability can be established. All I get are trivial mentions or blog/forum postings either from him or regarding him.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. MuZemike 23:04, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Thomas Falsetta has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Steve Crossin ^Talk/₂₄ 03:12, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to ICarly. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 05:03, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]