User talk:Reyeselena412

April 2010[edit]

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

The article Medea Lim has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:57, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Aedem[edit]

Hello Helene1878, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Aedem, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Simon-in-sagamihara. This has been done because the page seems to be about a person, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Simon-in-sagamihara. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of Simon-in-sagamihara (talk · contribs) 08:39, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:The Athenaeum.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:The Athenaeum.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 08:42, 25 February 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:42, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Barek. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Stephen Moore (economist) because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 02:17, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stephen Moore (economist). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:27, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]