User talk:Rhyddfrydol2
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Rhyddfrydol2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Deb (talk) 22:42, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Days of the Year articles
[edit]Yes. All Days of the Year entries now have to be accompanied by a citation from a reliable source to back up the date. This is because so many of them were found to be wrong. The new rule was introduced about 18 months ago and it will take a long time to get the existing entries sorted out, but no new ones are allowed unless they comply. That'll be why yours was removed. Deb (talk) 22:42, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Recent deaths
[edit]I see that you added an entry without an article. Please write a well-sourced article soon, or it will not stay. Red links are only acceptable if the subject has an article which may be in a different language. Your implication that we differentiate American and English is wrong and not helpful. An American without article would be deleted from the list as well. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:46, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- apologies Gerda Arendt - the original person who deleted the entry was very rude ... had he not been rude I might have respected his decision, as it is because he was rude I needed to challenge his decision. I presume you are telling him off for being rude? Rhyddfrydol2 (talk) 20:59, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- Please keep things simple and factual, - English is not my first language. I deal with Recent deaths A LOT. Subjects need to have an article, period. You can't expect people to check your history and see that you are rather new and don't know that. Look at the article below, which was written and is still threatened with deletion for being not "notable". This has nothing to do with American vs. English, and your references to that distinction are no testimony of Good Faith which in case of doubt should prevail. Summary: you are free to write an article about the person who died. It needs excellent independent sources, or will be deleted, as the one about Riyat may be deleted, or not. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:05, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- It seems notability is harder for medical people than footballers Rhyddfrydol2 (talk) 21:20, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
- Please keep things simple and factual, - English is not my first language. I deal with Recent deaths A LOT. Subjects need to have an article, period. You can't expect people to check your history and see that you are rather new and don't know that. Look at the article below, which was written and is still threatened with deletion for being not "notable". This has nothing to do with American vs. English, and your references to that distinction are no testimony of Good Faith which in case of doubt should prevail. Summary: you are free to write an article about the person who died. It needs excellent independent sources, or will be deleted, as the one about Riyat may be deleted, or not. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:05, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Compare Manjeet Singh Riyat. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:51, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Anthony Tsai Brooks for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anthony Tsai Brooks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Tsai Brooks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cassiopeia(talk) 05:40, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| For your creation of Shahin Shahablou. Bearian (talk) 00:35, 26 April 2020 (UTC) |
- What is a barnstar Bearian? Rhyddfrydol2 (talk) 19:07, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- A "Barnstar" is an electronic award for editing and other work on Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Barnstars. Bearian (talk) 15:02, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 14
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- 2021 Gloucestershire County Council election
- 2021 Devon County Council election
- 2021 Warwickshire County Council election
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)