User talk:RoadFan2015

Arizona urban freeway speed limit

I noticed in the Speed limits in the United States article, you recently changed the urban freeway speed limit to 55-75. Where in Arizona is there an urban speed limit of 75? I know Phoenix and Tucson are 55-65, while Flagstaff and Yuma are 65. Does Casa Grande count as urban? ANDROS¹³³⁷ _TALK 02:15, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The speed limit

Once you head out of Phoenix, you see a 75 mph (120 km/h speed limit and there would still be some town. And when you go on the mountain, it drops to 65 (100) thus the fact it is rural RoadFan2015 (talk) 04:46, 17 January 2016 (UTC) also, if you know the 75 speed limit in case grande, then yes. That may count.[reply]

March 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this recent edit to Speed limits in the United States by jurisdiction, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:58, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Texas

I reverted your edit to Western United States because Texas is not considered part of the area. —EncMstr (talk) 23:55, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Interstate 80, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:11, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to U.S. Route 82 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

amp;t=h&z=6 |title=overview map of US 82 |accessdate=2008-03-05}}</ref>The only time a 75 mph (120 km/h speed limit happens is in this portion of US 82, which counts for most other state roads (US 70 is another exception because it allows 75 mph in New Mexico.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:21, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Interstate 15, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. –Fredddie ™ 22:33, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Frank Lautenberg. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:57, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Speed limits in the United States. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:05, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — MusikAnimal ^talk 21:55, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 10:42, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@NeilN: I was just posting a thread on Talk:Speed limits in the United States/Archive 2#Reverts before I blocked anyone, could you please reverse this block and wait until a discussion has taken place, then block if there is none. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:57, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ritchie333: Unblocked. RoadFan2015, at least three different editors have brought up sourcing concerns. I do not believe you've ever bothered to acknowledge them or change the way you edit. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:33, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RoadFan2015, you have been blocked again by another administrator, but you really do need to start providing sources. Here you have changed the speed limit for the Dominican Republic but this source that I found indicates that the previous revision is correct. In all honesty, I was about to block you before the other administrator did, I then decided to think over what I was going to say to you. I can't see that you've responded to any of the messages left for you and you haven't left a message on the thread @Ritchie333: left on an article talk page inviting you to join in a discussion. I agree with @NeilN: that you haven't acknowledged any of your messages and you haven't altered the way you edit. You really need to start providing sources for the changes you're making and you also need to start responding to editors messages. People will be willing to help you but we can only help if you respond to us. If you carry on editing the way you are, your blocks are going to get longer and longer each time, they might even be indefinite.--5 albert square (talk) 12:32, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Speed limits in the United States. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:06, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Speed limits in the United States. Omni Flames (talk) 06:57, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! RoadFan2015 please respond

You've been blocked twice and are about to be blocked again. Do you have any why? Please respond and maybe the people who are trying to block you can help you learn how to work on Wikipedia. –Fredddie ™ 11:38, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, RoadFan2015. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]