User talk:Roadster243
Roadster243, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Roadster243! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 14 August 2021 (UTC) |
Correction of Umlauts...
[edit]I *like* what you are doing with the updates of pages to the correct spellings use of Umlaut. I would however note that User pages should generally not be changed, and talk pages are generally. I would suggest staying with mainspace and templates (Templates should generally have all redirects to other pages fixed (though if it is directed to a section in a page it should stay). I'd be happy to answer any questions on this.
As an example, Moebius strip should be corrected to Möbius strip (so https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AWhatLinksHere&target=Mobius+strip&namespace=0 has the ones that should be fixed). But https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AWhatLinksHere&target=Moebius+strip&namespace=0 may or may not be (Moebius may be appropriate if it is a title or something) Naraht (talk) 18:41, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- I came here to make a similar point. Thanks for the useful article corrections but, per WP:TPO,
it is not necessary to bring talk pages to publishing standards, so there is no need to correct others' spelling errors, grammar, etc.
Certes (talk) 10:38, 19 August 2021 (UTC)- Per everbody else, it's generally considered to be very bad manners to 'correct' other editor's comments on talk - unless you are 100% certain THEY WOULD WISH you to make the correction. No harm is done in this instance, but it will put people's backs up and - at best - is a bit pointless. Pincrete (talk) 19:22, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- I’ve seen this too - it seems to be your only edits. However, I am going to go one step further than the others who have commented. It’s fine, and an improvement, to correct the missing umlaut in article space. However, stop correcting editors’ talk page posts - especially as that seems to be your only contribution to Wikipedia. Making those edits can be disruptive as it can be taken as not only rude but a personal attack. It is a form of personal criticism to effectively say, outside of article space, “hey, bozo, you got the grammar wrong” in whatever language. Don’t do it. DeCausa (talk) 22:06, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- Per everbody else, it's generally considered to be very bad manners to 'correct' other editor's comments on talk - unless you are 100% certain THEY WOULD WISH you to make the correction. No harm is done in this instance, but it will put people's backs up and - at best - is a bit pointless. Pincrete (talk) 19:22, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 26
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siege of Bitche, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rossel. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
August 2021
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.